The Emissions Reduction Assurance Committee commissioned analytical work to examine several concerns raised about the Emissions Reduction Fund's Human Induced Regeneration (HIR) method (Human-induced regeneration of a permanent even-aged native forest methodology determination). The Committee found that the evidence from robust analysis does not support these concerns.
For a statement from the ERAC and a peer reviewed, analytical report by agricultural statisticians (Dr Stephen Beare and Prof Ray Chambers) into these matters, see Emissions Reduction Assurance Committee publications.
/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.
