Gov’s 15,000 Afghan visas a “mean and tricky” attempt disguise inaction: Rev Costello

Micah Australia

Christian leaders, as part of the Christians United for Afghanistan campaign, are urging Australians to not be fooled by the Morrison government’s announcement of 15,000 refugee places for fleeing Afghans, saying it’s a mean and tricky move to disguise Australia’s disappointing humanitarian response.

Immigration Minister Alex Hawke’s announcement that over the next four years 10,000 humanitarian and 5,000 family visas will be set aside for those who have or are fleeing Afghanistan isn’t additional to Australia’s already small annual intake of 13,750 people. Many of the approximately 5,000 Afghans who have already arrived in Australia will now need to apply for one of those 10,000 visa spots.

“Prime Minister Scott Morrison is on the record saying there’s no cap to the number of Afghan refugees Australia can take – but it appears there is, and it’s a paltry 15,000 over four years,” said Reverend Tim Costello, the executive director of Micah Australia.

“The Morrison government’s inadequate humanitarian response is a stain on our nation. This isn’t a compassionate response, it’s just more mean and tricky spin to disguise the Morrison’s government’s complete inaction.”

Rev Costello said by comparison in 2017 Australia lifted its humanitarian intake in response to the conflicts in Syria and Iraq when it offered an additional 12,000 people safety, on top of the annual humanitarian intake.

Christian leaders have called for 20,000 Afghans to be granted humanitarian visas, in addition to Australia’s annual intake.

“We spent two decades in Afghanistan as part of the military campaign – it is our moral duty is to take as many as we can.

“Christian leaders have consistently called for 20,000 Afghans to be taken in as an additional intake. Australia’s humanitarian cap was cut by 5,000 in 2020 to 13,750 – so we’ve been progressively shrinking our intake as it is.”

Suze Metherell 0412 867 084

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).