Grattan wrong on Super Guarantee, right on Age Pension

Industry Super Australia has described as 'deeply flawed' Grattan Institute claims that the Superannuation Guarantee (SG) at its current rate will deliver adequate incomes for future retirees.

Responding to a report released today, Industry Super Special Retirement Income Adviser, Phil Gallagher PSM, said Grattan's dubious modelling assumptions were unrealistic and unrepresentative of most Australian employees.

The three key flaws in the modelling are:

  • Assuming everyone can top up their super with extra voluntary contributions resulting in lifetime contributions that could be up to 50% greater than the basic SG;
  • Assuming a continuous uninterrupted 37 year working life and contributions, ignoring the reality of many workers especially women;
  • Assuming living standards in retirement shouldn't keep pace with the rest of the community;

Phil Gallagher, who previously headed Treasury's Retirement Income Modelling unit for 21 years from 1993 to 2013, said Grattan's modelling didn't bear any relationship to the typical experience of those who rely on the SG.

"Across all age groups just 12.2% of employees with super make additional concessional contributions but Grattan appear to have assumed that everyone does.

"This loads up contributions and inflates retirement balances significantly. The methodology adopted appears to skew up contributions for lower earners in particular, resulting in retirement balance projections that are potentially inflated by as much as 45%.

"There are many other problems including assuming an unbroken career which is not at all representative for women, and setting retirement benchmarks that are not pegged to community living standards. This lowers the benchmark making surpassing it easier to achieve", Gallagher said.

ISA does however agree with Grattan's conclusions about the age pension and need to adjust the asset test to restore coherent savings incentives.

One reason Grattan's modelling found little improvement from the increase in the super guarantee to 12 percent is because of the age pension asset test. Adjusting its taper is critical to ensure Super provides extra income over and above the pension as it was designed to do.

"Getting the SG to 12 percent is vital to deliver a decent standard of living for working people who have little scope to save for their retirement outside super," Gallagher concluded.

Phil Gallagher is

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).