The discussion paper:
- clarifies the current framework that supports R&D operations
- highlights current work aimed at improving the flexibility of the current regulatory framework and improving R&D pathways for industry
- considers where further changes could be made to improve the flexibility of the framework
- considers how regulatory 'sandboxes' and flight test areas are supported.
We're also seeking feedback on a specific proposal to expand flexibility for those flying remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) up to 25 kg over their own land.
This would allow them to operate for any purpose within the standard operating conditions, including for remuneration, over their own land.
This could allow flight testing of new systems, trialling autonomy features, or demonstrating prototype designs. It could also allow operations over land not owned by the operator if the remote pilot holds a remote pilot licence (RePL).
Why your views matter
We want to know what the barriers to R&D within the current framework are and make sure any changes have the right balance between innovation and safe flying. Your feedback will help us determine whether these proposals achieve that goal.
We are especially interested in understanding:
- the current barriers in place to R&D activities
- how the proposed changes could support the type of R&D operations you are conducting or planning
- whether you support removing purpose-based restrictions and requiring a RePL for certain operations
- what other steps CASA could take to support and enable R&D operations.
Your input will directly shape future policy decisions. It will guide how we refine the regulatory framework to support growth and innovation in the remotely piloted aircraft system (RPAS) and advanced air mobility (AAM) sectors.
Have your say: Submit your feedback via our Consultation Hub to help shape support R&D for uncrewed aircraft operations.
