Auditor General Condemns SafeWork, Calls for Major Reform

Unions NSW

Today's damning Auditor General report into Safework is an indictment on the organisation's conduct for the last decade and must be the trigger for robust reform to give workers a regulator they can rely upon, Unions NSW said today. Among the findings, the Auditor General says: "SafeWork NSW and the broader department took around eight years to actively and sufficiently respond to the emerging work health and safety risk of silica in manufactured stone." The organisation is also panned for promoting "the use of a real-time silica monitoring device even though the process to develop the device through procuring a research partner was significantly flawed, and importantly there were known concerns about its efficacy." The organisation has been referred to the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption regarding the procurement process. The report also notes that the regulator does not have a comprehensive performance measurement and reporting framework, nor does it use data strategically to inform risk-based decisions and says "it cannot demonstrate that it is making consistent and effective decisions to address non-compliance and workplace health and safety risks." The AG inquiry was triggered by multiple reports into the regulator's tardiness and timidity. In one case, SafeWork delayed inspecting a site when a man died after a 23 tonne skip loader reversed over him despite receiving four separate alerts about the waste management company before the fatality, including two a month before the tragic event. Last week the NSW Government resolved to transform SafeWork into a standalone regulator, following a separate inquiry led by former judge Robert McDougall KC. Unions NSW said the AG's report must be the trigger

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).