Explosive Offences Bill Passes Second Reading

Tasmanian Government

The Justice Miscellaneous (Explosives Offences) Bill 2025 has passed second reading in the Legislative Council, strengthening the ability of Tasmania Police to keep Tasmanians safe.

The Bill amends the Criminal Code 1924 and the Police Offences Act 1935 to address gaps in the current laws concerning explosive devices and substances, with a focus on 'homemade' or 'improvised' explosive devices.

Attorney-General, Guy Barnett, said ensuring explosive devices and substances are taken out of the hands of criminals, and kept out of our communities, is critical in keeping Tasmanians safe.

"These types of devices and substances represent a real danger in criminal hands," the Attorney said.

"As well as creating new criminal offences, this Bill will provide Tasmania Police with greater powers to investigate and charge individuals in relation to this offending.

"I want to thank members right across the Parliament for their support in making Tasmania a safer place."

Minister for Police, Fire and Emergency Management, Felix Ellis, said the use of homemade or improvised explosive devices poses a high risk to police, and the community.

"In several cases, explosive devices and substances have been found at the residences of people with links to organised crime," Minister Ellis said.

"There have also been concerning reports of these items being located when Police are undertaking duties such as responding to reports of dangerous situations, or when executing search warrants relating to controlled drugs and firearms.

"We will not stand idle while career criminals, bikie gangs, or members of organised crime syndicates put our communities at risk.

"Through this Bill, we're taking strong action to back in our Police and keep our communities safe."

Key Provisions of the Bill are:

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.