ICIBI stakeholder engagement survey - Resuts

In response to the stakeholder survey results, David Neal, the Independent Chief Inspector, said:

I welcome the responses to this survey and thank all those who took the time to contribute.

I am encouraged to find that stakeholders find participation with the ICIBI worthwhile, and gratefully take on board the suggestions for improvement.

Several suggestions were made for topics for future inspections, all of which have been noted and will form part of my consideration for my 2022 inspection programme.

I will now conduct a survey on an annual basis, to further inform my approach, and encourage participants to be as candid as possible in their responses. I would also like to remind stakeholders that they are free to contact me at any time, either directly or through inspectors.

Survey Results

Stakeholders who have previously engaged with the ICIBI through our fora, interviews or by submitting evidence for an inspection were invited to participate in the survey by email, and through the ICIBI's website and Twitter.

The survey asked questions relating to stakeholders' experiences of engaging with the ICIBI. It also asked questions about how they use ICIBI reports, and their views on the value of the recommendations we make.

Sixty-eight stakeholders from the ICIBI database were contacted by email, drawing their attention to the survey.

The survey was completed by 28 stakeholders in total, although not all respondents answered every question.

26 respondents described themselves/ their organisation as follows:

ParticipantNumber of respondents
NGO13
Home Office contractor/service delivery on behalf of the Home Office3
Other *3
Trade association1
Community group1
Local authority1
Local authority partnership (e.g. regional strategic migration partnership)1
Academic or researcher1
Direct personal experience of Home Office's border or immigration functions, e.g. EU citizen, asylum seeker, refugee1
Interested member of the public1
Other3
/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.