North Yorkshire fracking approval sparks outrage

Anti-fracking campaigners have lambasted North Yorkshire council for unleashing an assault on citizens’ rights to fresh air and clean water, after the local authority approved Britain’s first fracking operation since 2011.

Fracking will occur in Britain for the first time in five years after the local authority gave the green light for the move, in the face of fierce local opposition. The test drilling will be carried out in the picturesque village of Kirby Misperton by British firm Third Energy, with councilors voting seven to four in favour of the development on Monday night.

The decision has sparked widespread anger among local anti-fracking campaigners, who have launched a people’s declaration in a bid to halt the process. Calls for a full judicial review have also been issued by Friends of the Earth and Frack Free Ryedale, which spearheaded the campaign against Third Energy’s controversial application.

In a joint statement, both campaigns called on Downing Street to scrap its myopic approach to energy-policy.

"We urge and will support the government to develop a balanced long-term energy policy that will achieve our globally agreed climate change targets," they said.

"Today we resolve to continue to fight to remain free from fracking, to protect our communities, our beautiful countryside, our air and water, and to protect the future of the planet. We ask people across the country to join us by supporting this declaration."

Public overruled

Campaigners from Ryedale and other regions of the UK had launched thousands of objections, as public knowledge of Third Energy’s plans to frack in North Yorkshire came to light.

Documents from North Yorkshire County Council show a mere 0.8 percent of respondents to an official consultation backed fracking in the picturesque region, while 99.2 percent wrote in opposition of it.

The council’s planning division had previously recommended Third Energy’s proposal be approved, leaving councilors to cast their vote on Monday evening. An estimated 300 anti-fracking activists gathered outside the grand County Hall venue in Northallerton, where the meeting took place.

Although the crowd gathered outside the venue on Monday night was smaller, the campaigners’ message remained clear: fracking in Ryedale would severely hinder local farmers, the environment and the region’s business community.

"It is a war, now, they’ve declared on us," Sarah Hockey, an anti-fracking campaigner from east Yorkshire, told the Guardian. "It’s a war on our human rights to clean air and water so we’ve got to take it like that and keep pushing and pushing and pushing."

© Friends of the Earth

Third Energy wishes to frack at an existing drilling site located between Malton and Pickering, not far from Kirby Misperton. The sleepy village is nestled in England’s Ryedale District, renowned for its natural beauty.

The company hopes to use an existing pipeline at its well site in Kirby Misperton to transport fresh water there, while funneling gas away to the nearby Knapton Generating Station. The two-mile deep well, dubbed KM8, was drilled in 2013. It forms part of a network of pipes that feed into other drilling sites owned by Third Energy, which also connect to Knapton Generating Station.

Third Energy’s pipeline system was sharply criticized in 2008 over substandard maintenance and management practices spanning back years. It was also slated after one of its pipes gave way to a toxic sour gas leak in 2014 at one of its well sites in Pickering.

If Third Energy’s plans come to fruition, the drilling site will be the first of its kind to move into production. Britain has been frack-free since 2011, after test drills for shale gas off the coast of Lancashire were thought to have caused a number of small-scale earthquakes. Two subsequent applications to frack in the region have since been rejected by local councilors but remain under appeal.

Third Energy’s questionable record in Ryedale

Shale gas drilling involves pumping liquid deep beneath the Earth’s surface at high speed to break apart rock and free gas. While Downing Street insists the energy extraction technique is key to bolstering Britain’s economy and energy security, anti-fracking campaigners warn shale gas drilling could cause water pollution, traffic pollution, earthquakes and other forms of environmental degradation. Environmentalists also argue the energy extraction technique is unsustainable in the face of a worsening global climate crisis.

A chief concern for anti-fracking campaigners opposing Third Energy’s plans to frack in Ryedale rests with the fact the firm has failed to prove beyond all doubt that the test drilling would prove safe and a benefit to local residents.

A briefing published by Frack Free Ryedale in February laid bare the energy firm’s poor safety record in the pristine locale to date.

In particular, it highlighted "sour gas leaks," flooding issues, "staff accidents" and tensions with Britain’s Health Service Executive (HSE) over practices employed and equipment used, which had occurred after Third Energy drilling in Ryedale.

Key to the study was a series of Freedom of Information (FoI) requests sent to the HSE that uncovered a number of unsavory issues.

One line of inquiry leads back to 2008. The HSE revealed the findings of its yearly pipeline review were so ominous that it wrote to the pipeline’s operators - who are managed by Third Energy - highlighting the poor condition of the duct and other maintenance issues. Despite this warning, campaigners say little has been done by Third Energy to improve the condition of its pipeline system since.

A second line of inquiry revealed a sour gas leak had occurred in connection with this pipeline system in February 2014. A Third Energy staff member had reportedly witnessed water bubbling in a suspicious fashion at the energy firm’s controversial Pickering Well Site. Third Energy arrived on the scene several hours later, and confirmed the bubbling substance was sour gas. The noxious gas is a form of natural gas that consists of high levels of hydrogen sulphide. It is more dense than air, highly corrosive, poisonous, flammable and explosive. According to some reports, it is also acutely toxic in small doses.

Sour gas explosions have occurred on numerous occasions across the US and Canada since 2011, prompting widespread concern. Although Third Energy repaired the offending pipeline that gave rise to the problem, the timespan of the toxic leak remains unknown.

A third line of inquiry revealed that despite this dangerous leak, the pipeline has not been inspected since 2010. Following an FoI request, the HSE confirmed there are no planned inspections of the duct scheduled for 2016. Campaigners fear the government body has ceased inspecting the pipelines altogether. They accuse the HSE of failing to regulate Britain’s shale gas industry in a prudent or effective manner.

Environmental and public health concerns

Britain’s Environmental Audit Committee demanded plans to frack in Britain be suspended in late January 2015 on the grounds the energy extraction technique undercuts the UK’s climate change targets and could pose "localized environmental risks to public health."

Speaking after North Yorkshire council approved the application for Third Energy to frack in Ryedale, ex-BBC Environment Correspondent Richard Black said fundamental questions remain unchanged relating to fracking in the UK.

"Although proponents of fracking will claim today’s decision as a victory, the fundamental questions around UK shale gas haven’t changed," he said.

"As we see from protests outside the council today and from opinion surveys, the public is not supportive, and the economics remain unclear – so whether commercial fracking ever goes ahead is still an open question."

Black, who is also the director of Britain’s Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU), went on to question the sustainability of fracking in the face of global warming.

"Last year, the Commons Environmental Audit Committee said fracking is incompatible with our climate change targets, and the government hasn't been able to show they’re wrong," he said.

"If leakage rates are above a few percent, gas burning turns out to be worse than coal for climate change, and yet the government hasn’t set a maximum permissible leakage level."

Britain will not own gas extracted from the North Yorkshire site. Rather, it will likely be sold by Third Energy on the European market. In light of this fact, critics question whether such shale gas would do much to enhance energy and economic security in the UK. (RT)