An international study led by Monash marine ecologists has found that larger fish are much more important to feeding the planet than previously thought.
“Our models of how organisms grow and reproduce are based on the wrong assumptions, and as a consequence we are overharvesting wild populations with calamitous consequences for the world’s fisheries. This is particularly dire because around 20% of people on the planet rely on fish for protein,” he said.
Most theories on how reproductive output increases with body size assume that reproductive output increases proportionately with female size – that is for every unit increase in female size, there is a direct proportional increase in reproductive output. Or simply put – the combined reproductive output of two 1kg fish is assumed to be the same as one 2kg fish.
“Biologists have long suspected this assumption is wrong and that fish reproductive output goes up disproportionately so that a 2kg fish has much more reproduction than two 1kg fish,” Professor Marshall said.
“This is important because reproductive output drives the replenishment of fisheries – getting the relationship between size and reproduction right is essential,” he said.
“Larger fish are more important for the replenishment of marine fish populations than has been previously thought so most plans for harvesting fish populations sustainably are wrong.
“We have failed to appreciate how important large individuals are for sustaining fisheries.”
Professor Marshall said that worse, climate change is predicted to cause fish body sizes to decrease. The new research shows this will have severe consequences for fish reproduction and replenishment – warmer oceans will likely have fewer fish and much less reproductive output.
But the research also points to some good news, suggesting that current conservation strategies are more potent than previously thought with other research showing that in Marine Protected Areas fish can grow larger by 25% on average.
“Our discovery means that the benefits of Marine Protected Areas have been massively underestimated,” Professor Marshall said, “they produce far more new fish than unprotected areas of the same size.” —