Court declares Bank of Queensland used unfair contract terms

Upon ASIC's application, the Federal Court has declared several terms within some Bank of Queensland (BoQ) small business contracts unfair.

The unfair terms were in standard form loan contracts BoQ entered into with its small business customers after 12 November 2016.

'Small business owners deserve to be able to enter into fair loan contracts, especially where they have little or no ability to negotiate the terms. ASIC will take action against unfair practices in standard form contracts, whether it be for consumers or the small business community,' said ASIC Commissioner Sean Hughes.

The Court found that the following terms were unfair:

  • unilateral variation clauses which allowed BoQ to vary the terms and conditions of their contracts without giving borrowers advance notice or an opportunity to exit the contract without penalty;
  • event of default clauses which allowed BoQ to unilaterally determine whether a default has occurred as well as call defaults based on events that do not present any material risk to BoQ and without giving borrowers an opportunity to address the issue;
  • indemnification clauses which BoQ's mistake, error or negligence; and
  • conclusive evidence clauses which meant that if BoQ issued a certificate stating an amount owing by a customer, that amount would be assumed to be correct unless the customer could prove otherwise.

The Court declared the unfair terms void from the start of the contracts and ordered that the unfair terms be replaced with new, fair terms agreed by the parties. These fair terms must also replace the unfair terms in all standard form contracts from 12 November 2016 (in the same form as those put before the Court), that BoQ has with small business customers.

In handing down the judgment, Justice Banks-Smith determined: 'the declarations sought are appropriate because they serve to record the Court's disapproval of the contravening conduct, vindicate the claim by ASIC that the Bank had contravened the Act, assist ASIC to carry out the duties conferred upon it by the Act, and deter other corporations from entering into contracts containing unfair terms.'

The Court also accepted an undertaking from BoQ that the bank would not use or rely upon any of the unfair terms in any standard form contracts (in the same form as those put before the Court) with small business customers in the future.

Commissioner Hughes also said the decision was a timely reminder for insurers, following Government reforms extending unfair contract terms protections to consumer and small business insurance contracts from 5 April 2021.

'Now that unfair contract term protections apply to insurance contracts for consumers and small business, we expect all insurers to have reviewed all standard form contracts for fairness,' Commissioner Hughes said.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.