Governments' 'Emissions Reduction Agreement' will actually drastically increase emissions, say environment groups

Environment Centre NT

Governments' 'Emissions Reduction Agreement' will actually drastically increase emissions, say environment groups

Environmentalists have criticised the recently announced Energy and Emissions Reduction

Agreement between the Territory and Commonwealth Governments as another exercise in

funnelling public money to the gas industry.

The agreement, announced on Friday just before the commencement of caretaker mode, outlines a

range of funding, totalling $872 million, from both the Territory and Commonwealth for expanding

the gas industry, including LNG processing at Middle Arm and fracking in the Beetaloo basin.

Dr Kirsty Howey, co-director of the Environment Centre NT, said: "It is actually scandalous that this

is called an Emissions Reduction Agreement when really it is about funnelling hundreds upon

millions of dollars of public money to the gas industry."

"The Gunner and Morrison Governments are supposed to be working out how to implement

recommendation 9.8 of the Pepper inquiry, which commits them to offsetting lifecycle emissions

from fracking, but this agreement does nothing of the sort. It is a shameless splash of funds for their

gas mates."

"The words 'emissions reduction' have been reduced to meaninglessness under this government.

Far from reducing emissions, this agreement will increase them by expanding the gas industry and

enabling fracking in the Beetaloo. The RepuTex report into Beetaloo fracking showed us that to

actually offset carbon emissions from the Beetaloo would mean cost up to $22billion over the first

20 years of production. This makes fracking unviable."

"Carbon capture and storage is the lynchpin of the government's emissions reductions goals, but

everyone knows this is a farce. It has not worked at scale anywhere in the world and is plagued by

failures and scams."

"So many Australians are doing it tough right now in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Government should be supporting jobs in long-term, sustainable industries and businesses, not

handing out public money to its fossil fuel executive mates."

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).