Govt Cuts Frontline, Eases Stance on Organised Crime

Cuts proposed to Customs Officers and public servants combatting child exploitation, violent extremism, money laundering

- New Zealand Customs Service: 79 roles proposed to go including from ports, airports around the country

- Department of Internal Affairs: 41 roles proposed to go from teams dealing with digital harm, child exploitation, money laundering, counter terrorism and other regulatory roles

The Government is putting at risk the defences of our land and sea borders against organised crime, and our online defences against child exploitation, terrorism and online crime with cuts to critical frontline roles at Customs and Internal Affairs.

"This is irresponsible and dangerous at a time when these crimes are getting more sophisticated and causing more harm than ever before," said Fleur Fitzsimons Assistant Secretary for the Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi.

"The elderly and children are prime targets of online scams, which are growing in sophistication every day.

"The Government rolled back the smoking reforms because it was worried about the black market for tobacco yet is weakening the agency tasked with stopping criminals importing illegal tobacco products. How does that make sense?

"It has taken years for successive Governments and our Customs Officers to set up our internationally renowned border management. These cuts will harm New Zealand for years to come.

"The false promise of 'no cuts to the frontline' has again been exposed with these proposed cuts - try telling someone who has lost their lifesavings to an online scam that the tracking down of these criminals is a back-office function and therefore not important.

"These are the very people whose job it is to be exposed to some of the most vile and traumatising material imaginable and those who control our long borders as a last line of defence on behalf of us all. What could be more frontline?

Department of Internal Affairs

"The Digital Safety group is at the frontline of New Zealand's defence against online harm. Yet the spending cuts are forcing the Department of Internal Affairs to decimate the very teams keeping New Zealand safe from digital violent extremism, scams and online child exploitation.

"They are also proposing to axe 21 roles from the Anti Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism directorate. This is the team charged with supervising more than 5,000 financial institutions and other non-financial businesses and professions for compliance with measures to detect and deter money laundering and terrorism financing. This includes three casinos, 1361 law firms, 940 real estate agents and 633 accountants.

Customs

"Customs is the first line of defence against organised crime importing illegal drugs and firearms and is a critical agency ensuring everybody pays the correct revenue from duties and excise taxes. The work of Customs accounts for about 15% of total Crown revenue.

"The people who are facing possible job loss are carrying out valuable work on the frontline. Some oversee staff who work to ensure importers are correctly paying excise taxes and duties.

"Others train detector dogs who sniff out illegal drugs and firearms in mail, at airports and on ships. A halving of the dog training unit undermines effectiveness of this vital frontline role.

"The capability of the frontline Border Operations team is being weakened. These are experienced specialist staff who ensure all systems and processes are working effectively. They have responsibility for x-ray capability and other goods inspections work. None of this makes sense.

"Today, we are seeing the Government's real priorities - putting tax cuts for landlords and others ahead of the safety and security of New Zealanders," said Fitzsimons.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.