Public Input Sought on Gambling in Video Games

Dept of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications

Australians are being invited to have their say on the classification of computer games that feature gambling-like content, with consultation opening today on updates to the classification guidelines.

The consultation follows the Albanese Government's recent announcement of proposed improvements to the National Classification Scheme (the Scheme), including new mandatory minimum classifications for games with gambling-like features.

These proposed changes would see a classification of R 18+ (Restricted to adults aged 18 and over) for games which contain simulated gambling and M (Mature - not recommended for persons under 15) for computer games containing loot boxes that can be purchased or other in-game purchases linked to chance.

The changes would also insert new definitions around 'In-Game purchases linked to elements of chance', 'Loot Box', 'Real world currency' and 'Simulated Gambling'.

The new minimum classifications seek to address community concerns around gambling-like features in computer games and recent research which reveals an association between both loot boxes and simulated gambling and harms such as problem gambling.

Following the consultation period, the Minister will work with state and territory governments, as co-partners in the Scheme, to finalise the proposed new guidelines.

These changes are progressing while the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts explores options for more comprehensive reform of the Scheme, informed by recommendations from the recently released Stevens Review, academic research, along with industry and community feedback.

Submissions on the Guidelines for the Classification of Computer Games 2023 will close on 7 June 2023.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.