Review opportunity to modernise infrastructure delivery

The nation's peak motoring body welcomes the announced review of Australia's $120 billion infrastructure pipeline and supports efforts to improve the integrity and transparency of government spending in this area.

The politicisation of Commonwealth infrastructure spending by successive governments has for many years short-changed motorists and failed to deliver the safety, economic, or mobility benefits they need and deserve.

AAA Managing Director Michael Bradley said: "The AAA will be very supportive of transport spending reforms that deliver greater transparency and accountability. Both sides of politics have for too long been guilty of allowing political considerations, rather than data, to drive funding decisions.

"Efforts to avoid waste and inefficiency are appropriate and necessary, but the review must not become a cost-cutting exercise dressed up as an integrity initiative.

"Given Australia's appalling rates of road trauma; the current road maintenance back-log; and the failure of successive governments to reinvest fuel excise revenues contributed by motorists into essential land transport projects, now is not the time to reduce funding.

"The AAA agrees there are likely too many small projects currently being managed by the Commonwealth, but this does not mean all of these projects lack merit.

"The AAA supports efforts to better clarify the respective funding and delivery roles of Commonwealth, state, and local governments. It hopes the announced review will initiate structural reforms capable of delivering aligned funding, delivery, and reporting obligations.

"The AAA notes no Terms of Reference has been released but hopes the announced review will start to examine the factors that continue to prevent Australia from having a sustainable, data-driven, and well-understood system of prioritising, building, and paying for infrastructure."

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.