SA Workers Lose $325M in Unpaid Super, No Legislation

Super Members Council

One in four South Australian workers were underpaid their super in 2022-23, representing a loss in retirement savings of $325 million in that year, new research shows.

The analysis of new ATO data by the Super Members Council (SMC) finds 210,200 South Australian workers were shortchanged an average of $1,550 in super.

Over six years, unpaid super has cost South Australian workers $1.6 billion. The federal electorate of Adelaide had the highest levels of unpaid super in South Australia with a total of $182 million in a year.

Nationally, unpaid super is costing Australians $5.7 billion in 2022-23 or $110 million a week – a loss that can only be curbed by urgent payday super laws.

It comes as a new survey for SMC by Pyxis Polling and Insights finds more than 70 per cent of Australians want payday super laws to come into effect on 1 July 2026. Fewer than one in ten people think the laws should be delayed.

Despite this, payday super was not on the Government's legislative program for the first sitting fortnight of this Parliament, risking delays that would be paid for by everyday Australians in lost retirement savings.

SMC urges the Government and Parliament to get on with passing payday super legislation in the first 100 days of the new Parliament. These urgent laws will help 3.3 million Australians with unpaid super to be paid on time and in full.

In its submission on the payday super exposure draft legislation, SMC recommended a series of small but important changes to give employers the support and confidence they need in the transition to the new payment regime, smoothing the path to implementation.

These include extending the payment processing deadline from 7 calendar days to 7 business days, taking a phased approach to ATO enforcement in the early stages to give comfort to employers genuinely trying to do the right thing, and letting employers validate a worker's correct super account details at any time to prevent processing errors.

With digital payroll and single touch payroll reporting systems now available to all employers, many already pay super more frequently than quarterly. As of 2020-21, 56% of all small and medium businesses made super payments more frequently than quarterly.

Super Members Council CEO Misha Schubert says Australians can't afford any delay to payday super laws.

"It's disappointing the Government didn't make payday super legislation a priority in the first sitting fortnight of Parliament, when we know millions of everyday Australians are losing $110 million a week in retirement savings," Ms Schubert said.

"The average worker in South Australia could be shortchanged more than $30,000 from their final retirement nest egg if unpaid super isn't fixed urgently.

"We urge all Parliamentarians to get on with it – and pass payday super legislation in the first 100 days of this Parliament."

Table – Unpaid super by federal electorate in South Australia

Electorate

2022-23 financial year

Underpayments since 2017-18

People underpaid

Total underpayments

Average underpayment

Sturt

23,150

$38.5m

$1,660

$175.8m

Adelaide

23,450

$37.0m

$1,580

$181.6m

Spence

22,700

$36.3m

$1,600

$159.9m

Hindmarsh

21,800

$35.8m

$1,640

$168.3m

Makin

22,550

$34.4m

$1,520

$149.8m

Mayo

19,550

$33.0m

$1,690

$161.4m

Grey

21,100

$32.2m

$1,530

$157.4m

Kingston

16,600

$27.1m

$1,630

$149.0m

Barker

21,200

$25.8m

$1,210

$147.6m

Boothby

18,100

$25.4m

$1,410

$176.8m

Total South Australia

210,200

$325.4m

$1,550

$1.6bn

Source: Super Members Council analysis of ATO 2 per cent sample file, 2017-18 to 2022-23.

The opinions above are those of the author in their capacity as spokesperson for Super Members Council (SMC). SMC, the authors and all other persons involved in the preparation of this information are thereby not giving legal, financial or professional advice for individual persons or organisations.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).