We are "kowtowing to China": Fierravanti-Wells

Australian Conservatives Release

The Federal government is under fire from former Coalition minister ­Con­cetta Fierravanti-Wells, who claims it has been "outmanoeuvred by Beijing­" over the visit of three Chinese warships to Sydney Harbour.

Conservative Party leader Cory Bernardi has repeatedly called for a royal commission into Chinese Communist Party influence in Australia and this visit demonstrates the extent of China's political reach.

In an opinion piece in The Australian today, Senator Fierravanti-Wells says the visit - which was approved but not announced - shows the governm­ent has adopted a "supine­" approach to dealing with China by resorting to a policy­ of appeasement.

The Prime Minister downplayed the arrival of the ships on Monday, suggesting it was a ­routine visit and should not be the subject of "over-analysis".

But Senator Fierravanti-Wells says the timing­, on the eve of the 30th annivers­ary of the Tiananmen Square massacre, "demonstrates that Beijing can dictate terms and we just acquiesce," and the cabinet,"were totally outmanoeuvred by Beijing."

Senator­ Fierravanti-Wells, a strid­ent China critic says to, "dismiss the timing of the visit as a 'reciprocal visit' and that the task group was merely 'returning from counter drug-trafficking operations in the Middle East' was misleading to the Australian public."

Trade Minister Simon Birmingham yesterday dismissed the attack saying, "I'm not about to get into a public debate with a colleague, but we decide all the terms of our engagement (with China), and we do so seeking to ensure that the relationship is consistent, ­respectful and as engaging as possible."

Another government MP noted that Mr Morrison stopped the sale of Australia's biggest electricity network, Ausgrid, to Chinese buyers when he was treasurer, and was on the national security committee of cabinet when it banned Huawei from participating in the nation's 5G network.

Balancing Australia's relationship with its security partner, the US, and its main trading partner, China, is the government's No 1 foreign policy challenge.

Former Joint Intelligence ­Organisation chief Paul Dibb said, "It's a great pity that this was kept apparently so hush-hush, and that nobody thought it would be entirely wrong to have these warship­s entering Sydney Harbour on the eve of the massacre in Tiananmen Square.

He said that Mr Morrison was right "not saying provocative and foolish things" about China, but he should not turn a blind eye to its oppressive conduct.

"They are a great power," Prof­essor Dibb said.

"They have a right to be in certain­ parts of the world as they grow more powerful.

"On the other hand, it's a nasty authoritarian power with a dreadful human rights record."

The taskforce is comprised of the frigate Xuchang, the auxiliary supply replenishment ship Luoma Hu and the landing platform dock Kunlun Shan, with about 730 offic­ers and sailors in total.

Australian Strategic Policy Instit­ute executive director Peter Jennings said the taskforce was "probably the biggest to visit" Australia­ and argued that the public­ should "expect almost every year that there will be some sort of Chinese naval visit".

The ships, which docked at Garden Island, left Sydney today.

Mr Morrison conceded the arriva­l of the warships had caught people off guard, but declared "it certainly wasn't a surprise to the government".

Australia is under pressure from the US to take a hard line on Beijing's aggressive expansionism in the Indo-Pacific region, but Mr Morrison has been wary of offending China, particularly after a backlash in Chinese media over his description of China as a ­"customer" before last month's election.

In September last year, Senator Bernardi made a convincing case calling for a royal commission into Chinese Communist Party influence in Australia but he was refused.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.