2023 Forecast: Ration Cuts Risk Catastrophe for Starving Millions

WFP
Displaced women at the Port Sudan dormitory. Sudan's violence may take generations to overcome. Photo: WFP/Leni Kinzli
Sudan: Displaced women in Port Sudan - the country was rocked when conflict broke out on 15 April, driving thousands into neighbouring countries amid a funding crunch. Photo: WFP/Leni Kinzli

In the past year, the World Food Programme (WFP) has suffered the worst funding shortfalls in its 60-year history: we raised only US$10 billion of our projected costs of US$23.5 billion - a historic gap of almost 60 percent.

This has resulted in colossal reductions in the number of people we serve. With 333 million people around the world facing acute hunger, we were forced to cut rations outright for millions of people in countries such as Syria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Haiti and Yemen, pushing families deeper into hunger.

A WFP food distribution in Pama in Burkina Faso's Kompienga province. Photo: WFP/Cheick Omar Bandaogo
Burkina Faso: In Pama, Kompienga province, WFP is able to serve 6,000 people despite road blockades thanks to WFP-managed UNHAS helicopters. Photo: WFP/Cheick Omar Bandaogo

The tragic irony is that many of the places where WFP operates should not only be thriving by themselves but producing food for people in other countries to consume too.

At the beginning of 2023, Matthew Hollingworth, WFP's Country Director for Ukraine, summed it up neatly: "We're delivering food assistance in one of the most fertile countries in the world. It's perverse. We shouldn't need to be here - but we are, and we do."

But with conflict and climate extremes showing no sign of abating, humanitarian assistance continues to be the only lifeline for millions of people. Below, we look at just some of the countries where WFP's had to cut assistance in 2023...

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.