New York, USA – Greenpeace is demanding governments curb corporate interference in ocean protection as crucial Ocean Treaty talks begin at UN headquarters in New York today.
The talks are expected to have a crucial impact on the power of destructive industrial fishing activity on the high seas, which campaigners say could have "catastrophic" consequences.[1]
Megan Randles, head of Greenpeace's delegation to the talks, said:
"The fishing industry has been lobbying to weaken the Ocean Treaty for years. We need governments to curb corporate influence now, stop kowtowing to industry pressure, and stop the process from being tied up in delays. If they don't, the result will be catastrophic for ocean protection.
"The organisations that manage fishing in the high seas have always protected industry interests, that's why we're calling for a limit on how much influence they would have on sanctuary proposals, which are urgently needed for the ocean to recover. Governments must not allow the fishing industry's influence to hold the Treaty process to ransom."
Fully protected sanctuaries would cordon off huge areas of the ocean from destructive human activity, but it's something that the fishing industry has been lobbying against for years.
Greenpeace is calling on governments to curb the influence of fishing industry lobbying before it's too late, and ensure that fully protected high seas sanctuaries can be created without delay. Governments must therefore impose a maximum 120 day time limit for the review of sanctuary proposals, this would prevent the organisations that control high seas fishing, and fishing industry interests, from stalling the process. These Regional Fishing Management Organisations (RFMOs) have always protected the interests of the fishing industry, overseen the decimation of biodiversity and destruction of entire ecosystems, and therefore must not be allowed to tie up ocean protection in delays.[2]
Governments have committed to protecting 30% of the ocean in the next four years, a target that scientists say is the absolute minimum required for the ocean to bounce back from decades of destruction. Making sure that the process of creating sanctuaries isn't tied up in delays will be vital to this progress.
It is in the best interest of the fishing industry that RFMOs retain their power over the high seas.[3] That's why during the Ocean Treaty negotiations, they lobbied governments hard to ensure that the Treaty wouldn't undermine RFMO power. They even tried and failed to remove fishing activity from the scope of the Global Ocean Treaty altogether. This would have been a disaster for ocean protection.
