Dutton's Cuts Endanger Defence, Security Agencies

CPSU

Peter Dutton's commitment to cut 41,000 public service jobs from Canberra puts key national security and defence jobs at risk.

Analysis by the CPSU has revealed that more than 19,300 of the 69,400 Canberra based public sector jobs - or almost 30% - are in Defence and national security agencies:*

AgencyACT Based Staff% of agency staff in ACT
Department of Defence9,05945.2%
Department of Home Affairs5,55235.7%
Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission46453.6%
Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre11618.9%
Office of National Intelligence425100.0%
Office of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security47100.0%
Australian Signals Directorate**3,01482.6%
Defence Housing Australia20932.1%
Australian Submarine Agency41766.2%
Total in the above agencies19,303

The CPSU is calling on Peter Dutton to come clean with Australian voters, before election day, and outline which agencies these cuts are going to come from.

Quotes attributable to Melissa Donnelly, CPSU National Secretary

"Peter Dutton is making promises he knows he can't keep - claiming he can cut 41,000 public service jobs without touching national security, defence or frontline services. But the numbers make that impossible.

"Defence and Home Affairs are the largest public sector employers in Canberra. Nearly one in three public servants in the ACT works directly in defence or national security.

"That's why Peter Dutton keeps changing his story - the numbers just don't add up and he knows it.

"Australians should be deeply concerned that Peter Dutton is refusing to say which jobs, which agencies and which services will be cut.

"If he really believed Australians would back this plan, he'd be upfront about the consequences. Instead, he's asking for a blank cheque.

"Australians cannot trust Peter Dutton to protect national security, frontline services, or the public sector jobs that deliver for our communities every day."

30 April 2025

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.