EU Approves €1.46B Czech Aid for Poultry, Pig Disease Prevention

European Commission

The European Commission has approved, under EU State aid rules, two Czech schemes with a total budget of around €1.46 billion (CZK 35 billion) to support farmers in preventing the spread of certain poultry and pig diseases. The measures will contribute to the achievement of the EU's strategic objectives relating to the Common Agricultural Policy.

The Czech measures

Czechia notified the Commission of its plans to adopt two schemes with a total budget of around €1.46 billion (CZK 35 billion) to support farmers in preventing the spread of certain poultry and pig diseases and adopting biosecurity measures. In particular, the schemes aim to prevent the spread of: (i) avian influenza, salmonella and poultry campylobacteriosis, and (ii) porcine brucellosis, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome, and salmonellosis.

The schemes, which will run until 31 December 2029, are open to small, medium and large farmers in Czechia which put in place measures for the disinfection, disinsection, deratization as well as other biosecurity measures.

Under the schemes, the aid will take the form of direct grants to support the additional costs of the cleaning of farm premises and equipment, treatment of feed and water and veterinary interventions. The aid will cover up to 50% of the eligible costs.

The Commission's assessment

The Commission assessed the schemes under EU State aid rules, in particular Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ('TFEU') , which allows Member States to support the development of certain economic activities under certain conditions, and under the 2022 Guidelines for State aid in the agricultural and forestry sectors and in rural areas ('2022 Agricultural Guidelines').

The Commission found that:

  • The measures facilitate the development of an economic activity, namely the production of poultry and pig meat.
  • The schemes are necessary and appropriate to ensure that farmers put in place measures preventing the contamination of their farms and the spread of certain poultry and pig diseases. They therefore support general objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy of ensuring long-term food security and improving the EU's response to agriculture to societal demands on food and health, including high-quality, safe and nutritious food.
  • The aid will have an 'incentive effect', as the beneficiaries would not put these measures in place without the public support.
  • The aid is proportionate, as it is limited to the minimum necessary and will have a limited impact on competition and trade between Member States.
  • The aid brings about positive effects that outweigh any potential distortion of competition and trade in the EU.

On this basis, the Commission approved the Czech schemes under EU State aid rules.

Background

The 2022 Agricultural Guidelines provide guidance on how the Commission will assess the compatibility of aid measures in the sector, which are subject to the notification requirement, under Article 107(3)(c) TFEU. The Guidelines create a flexible, fit-for-purpose enabling framework to help Member States provide the necessary support and contribute, among other things, to the objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy. The 2022 Agricultural Guidelines aim to help Member States design national measures and meet national and EU's goals at the least possible cost for taxpayers and without undue distortions of competition in the Single Market.

The non-confidential version of today's decisions will be made available under the case numbers SA.107695 and SA.108787 in the State aid register on the Commission's competition website once any confidentiality issues have been resolved. New publications of State aid decisions on the internet and in the Official Journal are listed in the Competition Weekly e-News.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.