Federal Reserve Board announces individual large bank capital requirements, which will be effective on

Following its stress tests earlier this year, the Federal Reserve Board on Monday announced individual large bank capital requirements, which will be effective on October 1.

Under its framework for large banks-those with more than $100 billion in total assets-capital requirements are in part determined by stress test results, which provide a risk-sensitive and forward-looking assessment of capital needs. The below table shows the total common equity tier 1, or CET1, capital requirements for each large bank, which is comprised of several components, including:

  • Minimum capital requirements, which are the same for each firm and are 4.5 percent;
  • The stress capital buffer, or SCB, which is determined from the stress test results, and is at least 2.5 percent; and
  • If applicable, a capital surcharge for global systemically important banks, or GSIBs, which is at least 1.0 percent.

Capital buffers, such as the SCB and GSIB surcharge, are different than minimum capital requirements for each firm. The Federal Reserve supports banking organizations that choose to use their capital buffers to lend to households and businesses and undertake other supportive actions in a safe and sound manner. When using their buffers, banking organizations may make capital distributions up to prescribed limits, which include automatic limitations in the capital framework, as well as any additional limitations determined by the Board.

Also on Monday, the Board affirmed the stress test results for five firms that requested reconsideration. Those firms are BMO Financial Corporation, Capital One Financial Corporation, Citizens Financial Group, Inc., The Goldman Sachs Group Inc., and Regions Financial Corporation.

The reconsideration process involved an independent group-separate from the stress testing group-that analyzed and evaluated the results. The results were checked for errors and to ensure that the stress test models, which project the loan losses for banks, worked as intended and were consistent with the Board's stress test framework.

As the Board has done with input gained from a variety of stakeholders and events, including its annual stress test model symposium, the Board will assess the information learned from the reconsideration process and use it to continue improving its stress testing methodology.

BankMinimum CET1 Capital RatioStress Capital BufferGSIB Surcharge*CET1 Capital Requirement
Ally Financial Inc.4.5%3.5%n/a8.0%
American Express Corporation4.5%2.5%n/a7.0%
Bank of America4.5%2.5%2.5%9.5%
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation4.5%2.5%1.5%8.5%
Barclays US LLC4.5%5.0%n/a9.5%
BMO Financial Corp4.5%6.0%n/a10.5%
BNP Paribas USA, Inc.4.5%6.4%n/a10.9%
Capital One Financial Corporation4.5%5.6%n/a10.1%
Citigroup Inc.4.5%2.5%3.0%10.0%
Citizens Financial Group, Inc.4.5%3.4%n/a7.9%
Credit Suisse Holdings USA, Inc.4.5%6.9%n/a11.4%
DB USA Corporation4.5%7.8%n/a12.3%
Discover Financial Services4.5%3.5%n/a8.0%
DWS USA Corporation4.5%2.5%n/a7.0%
Fifth Third Bancorp4.5%2.5%n/a7.0%
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.4.5%6.7%2.5%13.7%
HSBC North America Holdings Inc.4.5%5.7%n/a10.2%
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated4.5%2.5%n/a7.0%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.4.5%3.3%3.5%11.3%
KeyCorp4.5%2.5%n/a7.0%
M&T Bank Corporation4.5%2.5%n/a7.0%
Morgan Stanley4.5%5.9%3.0%13.4%
MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation4.5%4.4%n/a8.9%
Northern Trust Corporation4.5%2.5%n/a7.0%
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.4.5%2.5%n/a7.0%
RBC US Group Holdings LLC4.5%3.6%n/a8.1%
Regions Financial Corporation4.5%3.0%n/a7.5%
Santander Holdings USA, Inc.4.5%2.5%n/a7.0%
State Street Corporation4.5%2.5%1.0%8.0%
TD Group US Holdings LLC4.5%2.5%n/a7.0%
Truist Financial Corporation4.5%2.7%n/a7.2%
UBS Americas Holdings LLC4.5%6.7%n/a11.2%
U.S. Bancorp4.5%2.5%n/a7.0%
Wells Fargo & Company4.5%2.5%2.0%9.0%

*The GSIB surcharge is updated annually in the first quarter.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.