Newly Published Guidance Addresses Achieving Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity in Clinical Research

Comprehensive document from the Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard offers practical resources and tools to improve inclusion of diverse populations

Boston, MA — The COVID-19 pandemic has illuminated social and health inequities and the impact of structural and systemic racism in society. While the lack of diverse representation in clinical trials is well known, comprehensive and practical guidance on how to improve diversity and inclusion in clinical research has been lacking. To address this gap, the Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center (MRCT) of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard announces the release of the MRCT Center's Achieving Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity in Clinical Research Guidance Document. The comprehensive document includes practical resources and tools and oulines a principled, multi-stakeholder approach to optimizing the inclusion of diverse populations in clinical research.

"Clinical research, and the lack of appropriate representation, is an integral component of the problem. Change and corrective action are challenging and will only occur with the commitment of the entire clinical research enterprise," said Barbara Bierer, MD, faculty director of the MRCT Center.

The guidance document begins with the scientific, ethical, and social arguments for diverse inclusion, as well as its business value. In the "Case for Diversity in Clinical Research," the authors adopt a broad definition of diversity, including demographic factors (e.g., sex, race, age, genetics), as well as non-demographic factors (e.g., comorbidities, organ dysfunction, concurrent medications, environmental factors, compliance) that may change over time.

"We recognize that the dimensions of diversity to be considered are context-specific, and the approach to and importance of diversity demand a context-specific analysis," said Bierer.

The document identifies a number of barriers to inclusion of diverse populations, and importantly, addresses potential approaches and solutions to increase diversity. Chapters explore broadening engagement, data standards and analysis, study design and conduct, and the accountability of each stakeholder. Specific recommendations and case examples are provided. The guidance is then followed by practical resources and tools (The Toolkit) to facilitate change.

The Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center Achieving Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity in Clinical Research Guidance Document was conceived from the MRCT Center Diversity project, "Diversity, Inclusion and Equity in Clinical Trials," with its mission to clarify the importance of, advance the goals of, and provide practical, applicable ways to improve the diverse representation of participants in clinical research. As part of this project, a workgroup was created, comprised of a dynamic and diverse group of stakeholders. The goal of the MRCT Center's Diversity workgroup is to clarify the meaning and advance the goals of diverse representation of participants in clinical research. Over the course of more than two years, it has worked to substantiate and qualify the value of diversity, inclusion, and health equity in clinical research; explore why diverse representation has not increased despite numerous calls to action; identify and analyze barriers that limit diverse participation; and develop guidance materials, tactical strategies, and tools to advance required changes to conceptual, organizational, and operational challenges

"We appreciate that this work is necessary, but not easy, and will take time to achieve meaningful change," said Bierer. "We appreciate that the guidance is a living document, one that will grow as experience and considered analyses inform successful approaches."

Visit the Diversity in Clinical Trials website

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.