Path to affordable financial advice

FSC

The Financial Services Council (FSC) welcomes the Quality of Advice Review consultation paper as it identifies a way forward to make quality advice accessible to more Australians.

CEO of the FSC Blake Briggs said: "The consultation paper outlines a sensible roadmap for delivering affordable and accessible financial advice by focusing on outcomes for consumers, not out-dated compliance documents and red tape.

"Financial advice is weighed down by layers of red tape that has pushed the cost of advice to more than $5000, putting it out of reach for most Australians.

"The Review has listened to stakeholders and got the balance right, by detailing a framework that allows consumers to get advice on the topics they need, with all the necessary consumer protections, and through a channel that suits them, rather than a one-size-fits-all model.

"The Review has also heeded the superannuation sector's calls to expand 'intra-fund' advice to allow funds to help members prepare for retirement, whilst protecting members' right to cost-effectively pay for that advice from their superannuation savings.

"The FSC has led public debate through our White Paper with the FSC's evidence-based proposals emerging as key planks in the consultation paper released today, including abolishing the safe harbour steps for meeting the Best Interests Duty, repealing unnecessary documentation requirements and introducing a consolidated definition of personal advice.

"The financial advice industry can now have hope that policymakers are listening to their concerns and will embrace the opportunity offered through the proposals paper to open new affordable advice pathways for consumers.

"The onus is on industry, consumer groups and Government to support the evolution of the simpler regulatory framework while maintaining necessary consumer protections."

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.