New research released today by The Australia Institute shows that 'time of use pricing' facilitated by smart meters is likely to drive up household energy costs.
Electricity companies and regulators have pushed for higher electricity prices at peak times, as well as higher 'shoulder' periods. In theory, this incentivises households to move their energy consumption to times of the day when it is cheaper for companies to provide it.
Key findings:
- An average household of four that cannot adapt its electricity consumption faces, under time of use charging, increased cost of $429 per year.
- Even if the household can move 30% of its peak electricity consumption to shoulder usage it still faces an electricity bill of $231, or 10.2% higher than under the flat rate tariff.
"After adapting to a decade or more of very high price increases many households have exhausted their capacity to cut electricity consumption or change their time of electricity use,'' says David Richardson, Senior Research Fellow at The Australia Institute.
"It's clear what's going on here - electricity companies are using the real problem of electricity demand peaks to push for higher consumer prices to increase their profits.
"Electricity companies pushing for time of use pricing claim it will help reduce electricity use in high-demand periods but analysis of the NEM shows that demand for electricity in Australia is inelastic and, even with a large increase in price, usage won't go down much.
"Rather than stinging households that have little capacity to shift consumption, regulators and energy companies should incentive those who do have the capacity to shift their usage through demand response programs.
"Demand response actually pays consumers to shift their consumption, and is widely used in Queensland and overseas. Companies could also subsidise household solar panels and battery storage to reduce peak demand."
