Smokers Turn to Illicit Sources for Tobacco

University College London

Published in Nicotine & Tobacco Research, the research analysed repeated cross-sectional survey data from 9,996 participants aged 16 or older who reported they currently smoked. It found that while most (76.9%) smokers reported only purchasing tobacco from legal sources, 23.1% reported purchasing tobacco from illicit sources at least once in the previous six months during 2025, up from 12.2% in 2023.

Lead author Professor Sarah Jackson (UCL Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care) said: "Our findings suggest that more smokers are turning to illicit sources of tobacco compared with 2023.

"That may partly reflect the financial pressures many people have faced in recent years, as people look for ways to reduce the cost of smoking, which also include switching to cheaper legal products, cutting down, or trying to quit completely."

Senior author Professor Jamie Brown (UCL Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care) said: "While our findings suggest a growing proportion of smokers are purchasing some or all of their tobacco from illicit sources, this does not necessarily mean the illicit market itself has become much larger.

"Our survey looked at whether people bought tobacco from different sources, but not how often they did so or how much tobacco they purchased from each source, which are important factors in the size of the illicit market."

Hazel Cheeseman, Chief Executive at Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), who was not involved in the current study, said: "Official government estimates* have not shown a recent increase in the overall size of the illicit tobacco market, which is estimated to have declined substantially since the turn of the century.

"However, this study should sound a note of caution to the government not to be complacent about past successes in controlling illegal tobacco. While the findings do not necessarily indicate a major expansion of the illicit market, they suggest there is a need to continue monitoring trends closely and maintain efforts to prevent illegal tobacco sales."

The study provides a snapshot of demographic trends in tobacco purchasing habits ahead of the rollout of the Tobacco and Vapes Act's Smokefree Generation policy in the UK, which will make it illegal to sell tobacco to anyone born on or after 1 January 2009.

The tobacco industry has argued that the Smokefree Generation policy will increase illicit trade. However, previous modelling studies suggest it will substantially reduce demand for tobacco, which could reduce both legal and illicit markets.

The main illicit sources reported by the study included tobacco bought cheaply from friends and tobacco sold 'under the counter' through otherwise legal outlets such as newsagents, corner shops and off licences.

The study also found that many participants below the legal age of sale reported buying tobacco from legal retail outlets, in line with long-term trends. Among 16-to-17-year-olds who had purchased tobacco, 73.6% said they had bought tobacco from newsagents and corner shops.

Professor Jackson said: "We were concerned by the number of underage participants reporting that they had bought tobacco from ordinary retail outlets. With the Smokefree Generation policy being introduced, it is hoped that access to tobacco will become more difficult for teenagers as the age of sale gradually rises."

She added: "The success of the policy will depend not only on changing the law but also on ensuring that it is complied with. Effective enforcement and clear communication with retailers and the public will be essential, alongside continued efforts to reduce demand by supporting more people to quit smoking or switch to less harmful forms of nicotine."

The study also found that most smokers still buy tobacco from traditional retail outlets such as supermarkets and corner shops. Cross-border purchases increased during the study period following the return to international travel post-pandemic, while online purchasing remained uncommon.

Dr Ian Walker, Cancer Research UK's executive director of policy and information, said: "While this research doesn't signal that the illicit tobacco market has grown, it's concerning that amongst the declining proportion of people who smoke, an increasing number of people are purchasing tobacco from illegal sources. This highlights the need for stronger enforcement.

"Tobacco still causes around 160 cancer cases every day in the UK, and action to bring down smoking rates is vital. The Tobacco and Vapes Act will help to protect future generations from the harms of tobacco, but the UK government must also back this historic law with sustained investment to tackle illegal tobacco sales alongside support that helps people stop smoking."

Longer-term trends from the same survey show substantial declines in both smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption among those who smoke over the past two decades.**

Study limitations

While the study represents a large and robust population sample surveyed over a multi-year time period, it relies on self-reported data which may be subject to biases in the memory of survey respondents or around social desirability.

The study did not capture the frequency with which respondents purchased tobacco from different sources, which may mean some purchasing routes are under- or over-represented.

The study also did not measure the amount of tobacco respondents purchased from different sources, limiting the ability to draw conclusions about changes in the overall size of the illicit tobacco market.

Online purchases may also be under-represented if respondents who purchased tobacco products through online grocery services reported the source as 'supermarket' rather than 'internet'.

* Government estimates of illicit tobacco:

https://ash.org.uk/key-topics/illicit-tobacco-facts-trends-and-industry-tactics

** Longer-term trends in smoking and cigarette consumption:

https://smokinginengland.info/ and https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2025/07/23/tc-2025-059469

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.