UK Gov Releases August 2023 Performance Update

On a monthly basis, we publish the latest official statistics on appeals performance, which represent the greatest volume (in terms of number of cases) of the work of the Planning Inspectorate.

We also update the appeals handling times data to give customers the latest information on the average time it takes to receive a decision and provide an update on our other main casework areas.

Appeals

Our appeal cases are dealt with in one of three ways: written representations, hearings, or inquiries. Ministerial performance measures include an expectation to reduce average decision times over time and make our decision speeds more consistent. All our decision times are measured from the day we receive a valid appeal through to the day we issue a decision. This is the same approach Local Planning Authorities (LPAs) use for application times.

We made 17,845 appeal decisions in the last 12 months. In July we made 1,517 decisions, slightly more than the 12-month average of 1,510.

We are making progress in tackling our caseload as we continue to close more cases than we receive. In July we received 1,673 cases and closed 1,771.

At the end of July 2023, we had 14,392 cases open, which is the fewest since August 2022.

Median decision times

The median decision time for appeals decided in July 2023 was 33 weeks.

Planning appeals considered by an exchange of written evidence (often called "written representations") is the area of appeals work where we make most decisions. Throughout this year we are focusing on making our decision times on these appeals more consistent. The current phase of this work includes deciding more than a thousand older appeals, which will lead to a temporary increase in average decision times. The average time for deciding planning written appeals was consequently 32 weeks in July, compared to 28 weeks for the whole year.

However, we are continuing to reduce the number of appeals awaiting a decision by hearing or inquiry, including closing older appeals. In July the median time for deciding planning appeals by hearing (26 weeks) was well below the 12-month average of 34 weeks. Median decision times for appeals by inquiry in July (29 weeks) was also slightly lower than the 12-month average (30 weeks).

12 months to July 2023 median decision timeJuly 2023 median decision time
Planning appeals by written representations 28 weeks 32 weeks
Planning appeals by hearing 34 weeks 26 weeks
Planning appeals by inquiry 30 weeks 29 weeks
Enforcement appeals by written representations 51 weeks 52 weeks
Enforcement appeals by hearing 68 weeks 34 weeks
Enforcement appeals by inquiry 82 weeks 80 weeks
All appeals 30 weeks 33 weeks

National Infrastructure

The number of applications has started to rise but we continue to meet all statutory deadlines.

We have a high number of Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIPs) at various stages:

  • 71 where we are providing advice before submission
  • 17 submitted and at acceptance, pre-examination, or examination
  • 5 where we are preparing our recommendation
  • 7 where the relevant Secretary of State is considering our recommendation

The continuous work to examine NSIPs is key to the economic growth of the country. One of the latest projects to be accepted for examination by the Planning Inspectorate is:

  • Gatwick Airport Northern Runway - The amendment of Gatwick Airport to support dual runway operations through the routine use of the existing northern runway and to accommodate up to 74 million passengers per annum

Local Plans

There are currently 49 live Local Plan examinations in progress.

We encourage Local Planning Authorities (LPA) to use our advisory visits to help them get their plans in good shape and deal with challenges well before submission.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.