UN Child Mortality Goal Lagging Worldwide

PLOS

A new study tracking global progress on child mortality finds that the world will miss a key United Nations (UN) health target by at least five years at current rates, with the burden falling heavily on Sub-Saharan Africa. The findings were published this week in the open-access journal PLOS One by Min Liu of Peking University, Beijing, China, and colleagues.

The UN's Sustainable Development Goal 3.2 calls for all countries to reduce the mortality rate for children under 5 to fewer than 25 deaths per 1,000 live births by 2030. As that deadline approaches, there has been no comprehensive assessment of where countries stand.

In the new study, researchers used data from the UN to analyze annual under-five death counts and mortality rates from 1990 to 2023 across 200 countries and territories. They calculated the rate of change in mortality over time and used those trends to project when those countries still above the target threshold would be expected to reach it.

The researchers found that globally, under-five deaths fell by 63% over the study period—from nearly 13 million in 1990 to 4.78 million in 2023—and the mortality rate dropped by an average of 3.18% per year. However, the global rate still stands at 36.72 deaths per 1,000 live births, well above the SDG target, and is not projected to reach the target until 2035. 133 countries have already met the target and 9 more are on track to do so by 2030. However, 58 countries will miss the deadline, including 25 that are not projected to reach the target until after 2050, and Dominica, where under-five deaths have risen. More than four-fifths of all under-five deaths worldwide are concentrated in just two regions: Sub-Saharan Africa, where the mortality rate remains at 68.82 deaths per 1,000 live births and is not projected to meet the SDG target until 2055, and Central and Southern Asia.

The study is limited by the assumption that trends over the last two decades will continue unchanged. Data quality was also poor in some conflict-affected regions and low-income countries, the very places where child mortality is highest.

The authors conclude that to meet UN targets, policymakers must focus on scaling up proven interventions—including skilled birth attendance, postnatal care, vaccination, improved nutrition, and treatment for common childhood illnesses—in every community, and especially in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Press preview: https://plos.io/3NwCfl5

In your coverage, please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS One: https://plos.io/3PgQhrD

Citation: Cao G, Liu J, Liu M (2026) Tracking under-five mortality from 1990 to 2023: Global, regional, and national trends, inequities, and projections toward achieving SDG Target 3.2 by 2030. PLoS One 21(4): e0343745. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343745

Author countries: China.

Funding: This work was supported by the Nationally Funded Postdoctoral Researcher Program (GZB20240035) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72441022). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

About PLOS

PLOS is a non-profit organization on a mission to drive open science forward with measurable, meaningful change in research publishing, policy, and practice. We believe in a better future where science is open to all, for all.

PLOS journals cover all scientific disciplines across life, health, and sustainability. All of our journals are peer reviewed and follow a rigorous editorial screening and assessment process. PLOS journals have a range of publication metrics available.

We place scientific rigor and integrity at the center of everything that we do. All contributors to our journals must follow best practices for authorship and publication ethics , comply with our research ethics policies, and agree to uphold our codes of conduct.

PLOS WeChat account: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/AXuXZh8wr8bm2I4nFL2h7Q

Media and Copyright Information

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.