US Conducts Antarctica Inspections

Department of State

A team of U.S. government officials from the Department of State, National Science Foundation, and Department of War conducted a five-day inspection of foreign research stations, installations, and equipment in Antarctica from January 16 to January 20. The team, led by the Department of State, inspected five stations: Australia's Davis and Law stations, China's Zhongshan station, India's Bharati station, and Russia's Progress station. The United States appreciates the logistical assistance provided by the governments of Australia and New Zealand, and by all the professionals at the inspected sites.

The United States continues to safeguard our national security interests and demonstrate leadership in Antarctica by ensuring the continent remains reserved for peaceful purposes only, pursuant to the 1959 Antarctic Treaty. This was the 16th inspection of foreign research stations by the United States in Antarctica since 1963. The inspection reflects this Administration's commitment to ensuring compliance with the Antarctic Treaty System, including provisions regarding prohibited military activities and mining, as well as other provisions promoting safe station operation and scientific research. The United States will present its report on the inspection at the next Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting in Hiroshima, Japan, in May 2026.

The Department of State leads U.S. policy on Antarctica, in cooperation with the National Science Foundation, the federal agency that administers the U.S. Antarctic Program (USAP). Through the USAP, the United States conducts groundbreaking research that can only be done in Antarctica, advancing scientific knowledge that benefits all Americans. The United States Indo-Pacific Command provides critical support to USAP with military airlift, aeromedical evacuation, search and rescue, logistical support, and other services.

For press inquiries, submit a request.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.