Weipa Train Collision Prompts Multiple Safety Actions

  • Bulk ore train was unable to slow down and collided with rear of stationary wagons;
  • Final report details ten findings, including three safety issues addressed by relevant parties;
  • Accident highlights importance of ensuring published rules and procedures are followed, with effective monitoring and auditing.

An Australian Transport Safety Bureau investigation into an empty ore train's collision with stationary wagons has led to the operator and Australia's rail standards board taking a number of safety actions.

A driver was unable to slow a bulk ore train as it approached a bauxite loading station north of Weipa, resulting in a collision with a rake of stationary wagons on 22 September 2019.

As detailed in the ATSB's preliminary report, the locomotive and four wagons from the stationary rake derailed in the collision. The modular driver's cabin separated from the main body of the locomotive and was substantially damaged, and the driver was initially trapped inside, but fortunately sustained only minor injuries.

The ATSB's final report, released at the conclusion of a systemic-level investigation into the accident, details 10 safety factors, which either contributed to the accident, or increased risk.

These include three safety issues, which have now been addressed by the operator RTA Weipa Pty Ltd, the Rail Industry Safety and Standards Board (RISSB), and the locomotive's design owner.

"The ATSB's investigation found the driver was not able to slow the train as there was no continuity of air through the train's brake pipe," Chief Commissioner Angus Mitchell said.

"This was due to the brake pipe cock not being opened when the locomotive and rake were coupled together, prior to the accident journey."

Compounding this, the ATSB found a brake continuity test was not performed during the pre-departure check - a missed opportunity to detect the issue.

"The coupling process being used was inconsistent with the published procedure, and routine audits conducted by the operator did not identify this inconsistency," Mr Mitchell said.

Additionally, the investigation found management of change processes were not applied when the end of train telemetry system became inoperable, and the Lorim Point dump station became automated.

"This accident highlights the importance of ensuring that published rules and procedures are followed, through an effective monitoring and audit process, which is fundamental to rail safety," Mr Mitchell said.

"Likewise, changes to rail operations need to be adequately managed to identify new or altered risks."

As a result of the accident, RTA Weipa has installed a revised telemetry system to allow drivers to perform brake continuity tests without relying on a second person. In addition, the operator has introduced safety improvements to the manual brake continuity testing, and all relevant team members have been re-trained in the test requirements.

The ATSB's investigation also found the design of the modular driver's cabin mount was not resilient to frontal impact forces, and the industry standard did not provide design and/or performance standards for modular cabin resilience and retention for locomotive crashworthiness.

Since the accident, RISSB has included modular cabin retention within the update to Australian Standard 7520, which is underway.

Separately, the locomotive's design owner, Progress Rail, has re-engineered the modular cabin mounts to improve strength, to reduce the risk of cabin separation in the event of a collision.

"One of the ATSB's primary goals is to encourage safety action to prevent reoccurrences when safety factors are identified, and I welcome the actions taken in response to this accident," Mr Mitchell said.

You can find here the report: Collision with rake of wagons and derailment of ore train R1006, Andoom (near Weipa), Queensland, 22 September 2019 | ATSB

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.