WWF Outlines Policy Actions to Save Grasslands

WWF

A new brief from World Wildlife Fund (WWF) details policy actions the US government must take to conserve America's grassland prairie habitats. Grasslands are critical for biodiversity and nature, hold approximately one-third of global terrestrial carbon stocks, and provide critical resilience in the face of climate change. They are also essential to livelihoods and food security. And yet each year we plow up millions of acres of grasslands, to the point where more than 70% of America's prairies have been destroyed.

The brief explains how some well-intentioned policies, like federal subsidies for crop insurance and the Renewable Fuel Standard, have inadvertently incentivized the conversion of grasslands. It also discusses how grasslands can be prioritized in existing and proposed programs and legislation.

Suzy Friedman, WWF's senior director of food policy, said: "World leaders are scratching their heads to come up with solutions to the dual crises of biodiversity loss and climate change. Meanwhile there's an obvious one staring us in the face: let's stop destroying our American grasslands, which are biodiversity hotspots and carbon sinks, and are vital culturally and economically. The US government can take common-sense policy actions to turn the tide and protect these critical habitats to benefit all of us."

Specific policy actions detailed in the brief include:

  • Amending the Renewable Fuel Standard
  • Addressing crop insurance subsidies
  • Advancing key opportunities in the 2023 Farm Bill conservation programs
  • Protecting and building upon Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) funding for grasslands, conservation, and climate-smart agriculture
  • Reducing food loss and waste
  • Passing the North American Grasslands Conservation Act

Read the full brief and executive summary.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.