A long way to go despite State Government's praise for Reef farmers

Don't get me wrong; when the Minister for the Environment and Great Barrier Reef Meaghan Scanlon said she wanted to "acknowledge farmers and graziers for their efforts to move away from using practices that pose a high risk to water quality," I was happy.

AgForce, industry groups, and hundreds of cane farmers and beef cattle graziers affected by, or about to be affected by, the Government's Reef regulations and standards have battled long and hard for some recognition when it comes to the fantastic work done over many years to ensure our methods produce clean runoff.

But pretty quickly I became disillusioned and disappointed as I realised that in just a few days yet more regulation - this latest raft for new expanded commercial cropping - will be introduced.

Yes, I'm happy that our talks with the Government have resulted in some concessions being made to these new regulations, and hopefully more will come to pass in the days before 1 June.

But the problem I have is that despite our calls for regular, consistent water quality testing of all six catchments so that we can accurately know the quality of the water on the Reef - it still hasn't happened.

Instead, the science used by Minister Scanlon to both praise and regulate us is more than two years old - the results taken from the Reef Water Quality Report Card 2019.

If we were improving our nutrient and irrigation management based on 2019 practices, then we must be, and are, flying now.

And yet rather than being rewarded with less regulation, we're the scapegoats for a range of other industries and factors that go ignored because green groups like a target.

So while I and others like me enjoy the praise, at least for a moment, those at the coalface of regulation and an overwhelming array of reporting requirements wait for the real science.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.