Budget Overlook: Parent Advocacy Needs Ignored

The ACT Council of Parents and Citizens Associations is deeply disappointed that the ACT Government has failed to deliver on its election promise to fund a trial of an independent parent advocacy service in the 2025-26 Budget.

Despite a clear commitment made in the Government's policy position statement in the lead-up to the last election, no funding has been allocated this year to initiate the much-needed service that would support families struggling to navigate the education system.

Council Executive Officer Veronica Elliott said the omission is a blow to families who are already under immense pressure.

"In the past 18 months, we have seen a sharp rise in the number of families reaching out in desperation - confused, exhausted and unsure where to turn for help," Ms Elliott said.

"A trial of an independent parent advocacy service would have been a small investment for the Government but would have had a transformative impact for families trying to get the support their children need in public schools. Expecting these families to continue to suffer is unacceptable."

While Council acknowledges the budgetary pressures the Government is facing, it is concerned about deferrals of essential reforms. Council recognises that not all areas were cut back in the Budget. The Equity Fund remains intact, providing some relief, and the Government continues to express support for important reforms.

"We know it's a tough budget and we don't expect everything at once - but the reality is families are struggling now. Our community needs action, not delay."

Council is urging the Government to reconsider its priorities and to engage meaningfully with parents and school communities to ensure that future budgets deliver on promises and meet the real, immediate needs of ACT public school families.

Published: 24/6/25

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.