Conventional Speech Therapy Plus Singing for Parkinson's Voice

Wiley

Speech and voice disorders are common in individuals with Parkinson's disease. New research published in the International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders found that a tele-rehabilitation program that combines conventional speech therapy and singing may help improve patients' voice problems.

For the study, 33 people with Parkinson's disease were randomly assigned to receive the combination therapy, conventional speech therapy, or a singing intervention. Each patient participated in 12 tele-rehabilitation sessions over four weeks. Voice-related tests were conducted one week before the first intervention session, one week after the last intervention session, and three months after the last evaluation.

The results showed significant improvements in all three groups after treatment in all outcomes over time. Patients who were in the combination or speech therapy groups showed a greater increase in voice intensity and what's called the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) compared with patients in the singing intervention group. (The VHI measures patients' perceptions of the impact of their voice disorder.) Also, combination therapy, compared with singing or speech therapy in isolation, had significantly greater effects on the VHI, maximum frequency range, and shimmer.

"Tele-rehabilitation combination therapy is an inexpensive and enjoyable behavioral treatment," the authors wrote. "The advantages of this method are that it is easy to access, appropriate for many stages of voice problems in Parkinson's disease, requires no prior singing training, encourages voice health and self-management, and maximizes treatment resources available to people with Parkinson's disease."

URL upon publication: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.12900

Additional Information

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.