IMF Wraps 2025 Talks on Eastern Caribbean Policies

Washington, DC: The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation [1] with member countries on common policies of the Eastern Caribbean Currency Union (ECCU). The Board considered and endorsed the staff appraisal without a meeting. [2]

The currency union has provided a strong anchor for macroeconomic stability. In 2024, strong tourism performance and continued infrastructure investments have supported robust growth of 3.9 percent, and inflation moderated to below 2 percent in tune with global trends. This has facilitated a moderate reduction in the currency union's fiscal and external imbalances, although public debt remains high at above 71 percent of GDP and the post-pandemic trend of narrowing of sizable current account deficits has stalled. The ECCB's stable reserves underpin a strong currency backing ratio. The ECCU financial system has remained stable, though exhibiting legacy asset quality and credit condition weaknesses.

The union's recent growth momentum is projected to wane. Increasing constraints to tourism capacity and completion of major infrastructure projects are set to slow real GDP growth to around 2½ percent over the medium term. Modest growth prospects reflect weak productivity and local investment, as well as headwinds from ageing populations, a shrinking labor force, and constrained fiscal space for public investment in most union members. Fiscal and external imbalances are projected to narrow over the medium term, reflecting in part completion of import-intensive public investment projects.

Risks to the outlook remain mostly on the downside amid a highly uncertain external environment. As reported in the April World Economic Outlook, the escalation of trade tensions and high levels of policy uncertainty are a major negative shock to global economic activity. For ECCU economies, increased global trade and geopolitical tensions could give rise to disruptions to tourism and FDI inflows and renewed inflationary pressures. High public debt, persistent current account deficits and weaknesses in the local financial system amplify vulnerability to recurrent ND shocks alongside the uncertain outlook for future citizenship-by-investment inflows.

Executive Board Assessment [3]

The ECCU has achieved a strong rebound from successive adverse shocks. Strong tourism performance and continued infrastructure investments have supported robust post‑pandemic growth, while inflation has moderated in tune with global trends. This has facilitated a moderate reduction in the currency union's fiscal and external imbalances, although public debt levels and current account deficits remain high in several members. The ECCU's external position is assessed as weaker than implied by fundamentals and desirable policies, but the current account deficits remain fully financed and the stability of the ECCB's reserves underpin a strong currency backing ratio. The financial system has remained stable, albeit exhibiting continued asset quality and credit condition weaknesses.

Growth momentum is nonetheless projected to wane and risks to the outlook remain mostly on the downside. Increasing constraints to tourism capacity and completion of major infrastructure projects are set to slow growth to around 2½ percent over the medium term. This modest growth potential reflects weak productivity and local investment, as well as headwinds from ageing populations, a shrinking labor force, and constrained fiscal space for public investment in most union members. Downside risks to the outlook are significant amid a highly uncertain external environment, where increased trade and geopolitical tensions could give rise to renewed inflationary pressures and disruptions to tourism and FDI inflows. High public debt, persistent current account deficits, and weaknesses in the local financial system amplify vulnerability to recurrent natural disaster (ND) shocks alongside the uncertain outlook for future Citizenship-by-Investment (CBI) inflows.

Achieving more robust, resilient, and inclusive long-term growth would support the currency union's fiscal and external sustainability and raise living standards. To support this objective, common regional policies should be anchored in building economic, fiscal, and financial resilience and addressing supply bottlenecks that underpin the recent decades' downward trend in the region's growth potential.

A key policy priority is alleviating the region's structural growth impediments, which calls for a coordinated multipronged approach. Addressing frictions to employment and skills development requires a renewed effort to attune human capital to economic needs and development priorities through vocational training and modernized education systems, complemented by active labor market policies and improved access to child and elderly care. Common policies can also enhance the scale, resilience, and efficiency of the region's capital stock by helping to accelerate energy transition to local renewables, optimize the CBI funding model, and increase ND preparedness. Substantial productivity gains may also be achieved through cooperative efforts to address bottlenecks to innovation and allocative efficiency, including by digitalizing key services, streamlining licensing and administrative processes, and strengthening financial intermediation.

Fiscal policies should remain closely focused on rebuilding buffers, reducing public debt consistent with the regional debt anchor, and improving resilience to shocks. Region‑wide adoption of strong medium-term fiscal frameworks (MTFFs) embedded with well-designed fiscal rules and credible policy plans would support sustainability objectives and create policy space for growth-enhancing social and resilience investment. Comprehensive fiscal resilience strategies, including adequate disaster-financing frameworks, can help alleviate periodic ND disruptions to debt sustainability and support the region's growth resilience. Strengthening fiscal management of uncertain CBI revenues can similarly alleviate risks and facilitate fiscal planning. These efforts can be supported by more institutionalized regional oversight and continued strengthening of national fiscal institutions.

Enhancing financial system resilience and reducing persistent credit-frictions can support a more conducive environment for growth-supporting local investment. Regional policy priorities include reducing vulnerabilities from legacy bank balance sheet weaknesses, mitigating risks from rapid credit union expansion, building readiness to manage risks from high dependency on global reinsurance, and strengthening national AML/CFT frameworks. Common minimum NBFI regulatory standards under the planned Eastern Caribbean Financial Stability Board (ECFSB) will be an important step toward their more unified oversight, although a more centralized supervisory structure would better facilitate management of regional stability risks. Coordinated efforts to reduce institutional frictions in local credit markets and support small ECCU businesses' bankability can help address structural challenges in financial intermediation, revive local credit and investment, and foster development of a more vibrant private sector.

Strengthening economic data could significantly improve regional policy design and risk management. Priorities include addressing shortcomings in coverage, quality, and timeliness of key national and external accounts and reducing significant blind spots in areas such as the regional labor markets and CBI flows. Greater leveraging of synergies in regional data compilation and processing could help address persistent resource and capacity gaps.

Table 1. ECCU: Selected Economic and Financial Indicators, 2020-2026 1/

Est.

Proj.

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

(Annual percentage change)

Output and Prices

Real GDP

-17.6

6.5

11.8

3.7

3.9

3.5

2.7

GDP deflator

-2.2

4.4

4.1

3.3

2.7

1.7

2.1

Consumer prices, average

-0.6

1.7

5.6

4.0

2.3

1.9

2.0

Monetary Sector

Net foreign assets

6.1

16.5

-0.7

11.5

4.8

1.7

4.1

Central bank

3.6

11.6

-4.8

5.4

12.3

5.9

4.4

Commercial banks (net)

8.5

21.1

2.8

16.3

-0.5

-1.7

3.7

Net domestic assets

-16.5

1.2

13.0

-5.8

7.9

11.0

6.1

Of which: private sector credit

-0.9

1.5

1.6

3.6

4.7

5.1

2.5

Broad money (M2)

-4.7

10.1

4.6

4.3

6.0

5.3

4.9

(In percent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated)

Public Finances

Central government

Total revenue and grants

29.0

30.5

29.7

30.0

30.8

28.3

27.3

Total expenditure and net lending

35.8

33.4

32.5

31.2

32.2

32.8

27.8

Overall balance 2/

-6.8

-2.9

-2.7

-1.3

-1.4

-4.5

-0.5

Of which: expected fiscal cost of natural disasters

0.5

0.4

0.5

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.7

Excl. Citizenship-by-Investment Programs

-11.5

-8.7

-9.3

-8.0

-7.3

-8.4

-3.6

Primary balance 2/

-4.3

-0.6

-0.5

0.9

1.1

-1.8

1.7

Total public sector debt

89.2

84.5

76.2

73.9

71.2

70.8

69.9

External Sector

Current account balance

-19.1

-18.5

-12.3

-10.3

-10.4

-9.9

-8.3

Trade balance

-29.5

-30.1

-33.3

-32.0

-34.2

-34.1

-32.7

Exports, f.o.b. (annual percentage change)

-28.5

31.5

40.5

21.9

-9.7

13.9

11.4

Imports, f.o.b. (annual percentage change)

-23.2

15.2

29.7

5.3

11.0

5.8

1.9

Services, incomes and transfers

10.4

11.6

20.9

21.8

23.9

24.2

24.5

Of which: travel

17.1

20.5

34.6

39.8

42.1

42.2

42.5

External public debt

47.9

47.6

42.6

42.7

42.1

43.7

44.8

External debt service (percent of goods and nonfactor services)

21.3

14.8

10.3

9.0

10.3

9.1

8.6

International reserves

In millions of U.S. dollars

1,747

1,952

1,869

1,972

2,202

2,332

2,435

In months of prospective year imports of goods and services

5.7

4.8

4.0

4.0

4.2

4.4

4.4

In percent of broad money

28.1

28.5

26.1

26.4

27.8

28.0

27.9

REER (average annual percentage change)

Trade-weighted 3/

-.07

-2.8

3.1

-1.1

-1.0

Sources: Country authorities; and IMF staff estimates and projections.

1/ Includes all eight ECCU members unless otherwise noted. ECCU consumer price aggregates are calculated as weighted averages of individual country data. Other ECCU aggregates are calculated by adding individual country data. The staff report projections are based on the information available as of March 31, 2025. It, therefore, does not reflect the impact of the escalation of trade tensions on and after April 2, 2025.

2/ Projections include expected fiscal costs of natural disasters.

3/ Excludes Anguilla and Montserrat.

[1] Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. Staff hold separate annual discussions with the regional institutions responsible for common policies in four currency unions—the Euro Area, the Eastern Caribbean Currency Union, the Central African Economic and Monetary Union, and the West African Economic and Monetary Union. For each of the currency unions, staff teams visit the regional institutions responsible for common policies in the currency union, collects economic and financial information, and discusses with officials the currency union's economic developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report, which forms the basis of discussion by the Executive Board. Both staff's discussions with the regional institutions and the Board discussion of the annual staff report will be considered an integral part of the Article IV consultation with each member.

[2] The staff report reflects discussions with the authorities during January 8-16 and January 27-February 10, 2025, and is based on the information available as of March 31, 2025. It, therefore, does not reflect the impact of the escalation of trade tensions on and after April 2, 2025. Based on information available until April 29, 2025, and covered in the Staff Supplement, the thrust of the staff appraisal remains unchanged.

[3] The Executive Board takes decisions under its lapse-of-time procedure when the Board agrees that a proposal can be considered without convening formal discussions.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.