Keyera's Energy Hub Buy Faces Competition Challenge

Competition Bureau Canada

GATINEAU (Québec), Competition Bureau

The Competition Bureau has filed an application with the Competition Tribunal challenging Keyera Corp.'s (Keyera) proposed acquisition of Plains All American Pipeline L.P.'s (Plains) Canadian natural gas liquids business.

The Bureau is challenging the proposed transaction because it would reduce competition at Canada's most important natural gas liquids hub at Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta, harming Canadian energy producers and increasing costs across the supply chain.

Natural gas liquids processing, which includes fractionation and storage, is a critical part of Canada's energy economy, supplying products used to heat homes, support agriculture, and manufacture petrochemicals, while enabling Canadian producers to participate in domestic and international markets.

Following an extensive investigation, the Bureau concluded that the proposed transaction is likely to harm competition in natural gas liquids processing at Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta, Canada's primary hub for these services.

The Bureau's review found that the transaction would harm competition by:

  • eliminating Plains as a close competitor in Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta;
  • reducing the number of major competitors from three to two, significantly increasing market concentration in natural gas liquids processing; and
  • giving the merged firm greater ability to increase prices, impose less favourable contract terms, reduce incentives to expand capacity, and further entrench control over critical infrastructure.

The Bureau is seeking an order from the Competition Tribunal to preserve competition in the processing of natural gas liquids at the Fort Saskatchewan hub.

The final decision in this matter rests with the Competition Tribunal.

A backgrounder provides additional information about the Bureau's review.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.