Nature Protection Lags: $1 vs. $30 Destruction Ratio

The United Nations

The world spends billions to protect nature, but trillions are being invested in business activities that harm the environment.

The UN on Thursday issued a call for widespread financial reform as the most powerful way to shift global markets towards realising a better world, for people and the planet.

For every dollar invested in protecting nature, 30 dollars are spent on destroying it - that's the central finding of the State of Finance for Nature 2026 report, which calls for a major policy shift towards scaling up solutions that help the natural world - and support the economy at the same time.

Damage control

The data identifies several areas where the damage is particularly stark: utilities, industrials, energy and basic materials; and sectors which benefit from environmentally harmful subsidies - namely fossil fuels, agriculture, water, transport and construction.

"If you follow the money, you see the size of challenge ahead of us," said Inger Andersen, Executive Director of UNEP , in response to the report, contrasting the slow progress of nature-based solutions with harmful investments and subsidies which, she declared, are surging ahead.

"We can either invest in nature's destruction or power its recovery - there is no middle ground."

A wealth of solutions

As well as identifying the size of the imbalance, the report's authors lay out a vision of a "big nature turnaround," highlighting examples of solutions that both work, and are economically viable.

They include:

  • greening urban areas to counter heat-island effects and improve liveability for citizens;
  • embedding nature in road and energy infrastructure;
  • Producing emissions-negative building materials.

The study also charts a path for phasing out harmful subsidies and destructive investment in systems of production and scaling up investments that are "nature-positive."

/UN News Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.