Queensland Productivity Commission To Review GST Flaws

Treasurer, Minister for Energy and Minister for Home Ownership The Honourable David Janetzki
  • The Crisafulli Government continues to stand up for Queensland to get its fair share of GST revenue.
  • The Queensland Productivity Commission will conduct a review of the economic impacts of the GST system.
  • Queensland is set to lose a record $2.3 billion in GST in 2025-26, after a decade of financial mismanagement by the former Labor Government.
  • The Crisafulli Government is delivering a better lifestyle through a stronger economy and a fresh start for Queensland.

The Crisafulli Government is continuing to fight for Queensland's fair share by directing the Queensland Productivity Commission to undertake a comprehensive review of the economic impacts of the current GST distribution system.

The Federal Government's decision to strip a record $2.3 billion in GST revenue from Queensland taxpayers this financial year, and $5.3 billion over the next three, has compounded the significant challenges left by the former Labor Government after a decade of fiscal vandalism.

The Queensland Productivity Commission review will assess the economic impact of GST distribution including on the Queensland economy and state's capacity to deliver services to support growth and social outcomes, as well as economic outcomes for Queensland relative to other states and territories, including capital and labour mobility.

Over the past decade, Queensland's GST revenue has grown by only 28 per cent, while GST revenue received by New South Wales, Victoria and Western Australia has grown by 58 per cent, 118 per cent and 317 per cent respectively over the same period.

If Queensland's GST revenue had grown in line with national GST payments it would this year have been worth $22.7 billion - $6.1 billion higher than reality - and helped repair a decade of the former Labor Government's financial mismanagement.

The existing methodology used to calculate GST also penalises the State for developing its resources industry, while leaving Queensland to also foot the bill for the policy failures of New South Wales and Victoria during COVID-19.

Treasurer David Janetzki said the findings would inform and strengthen Queensland's advocacy for meaningful GST reform.

"Queenslanders are being short-changed, while other states benefit from billions in additional GST revenue," Treasurer Janetzki said.

"It is clear the current system to calculate GST distribution is seriously flawed and the impact of Canberra's record redistribution away from Queensland this year is more acute given the former Labor government's decade of fiscal vandalism.

"At a time the Federal Government is buck passing on their responsibilities for Aged Care and the NDIS and heaping further pressure on state-run hospitals, with the other hand they are ripping away Queensland's GST share, it's not right.

"I have written to the Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers on multiple occasions, requesting appropriate fiscal support to offset the negative impacts on Queensland.

"If Canberra won't act, we will. I've instructed the QPC to undertake its own review of the economic impacts of Australia's GST distribution system, particularly on Queensland.

"We're simply asking that Queensland receives its fair share of GST so we can deliver a better lifestyle through a stronger economy."

The current Federal Productivity Commission inquiry into the GST system, should have presented an opportunity to address these issues but the Terms of Reference would not facilitate the holistic view needed to drive national productivity and provide a truly fair distribution of revenue across states.

The QPC will report back with an interim report in February, before finalising its report in April.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.