The review , led by Eva Marija Čad of the University of Ljubljana and Wageningen University & Research, alongside Professor Graham Finlayson of the University of Leeds and colleagues from other institutions in the Netherlands, Denmark, Spain and Belgium, was developed in connection with a 2025 webinar series hosted by the Institute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences (IAFNS).
About the Study
"Effects of Non-Nutritive Sweeteners and Sweet Taste Exposure on Weight Management, Biomarkers of Health and Sweet Taste Preference — A Review of the Evidence from Recent European Consortia Studies" was published in the peer-reviewed journal Nutrients. The review of the European evidence was supported by IAFNS' Low- and No-Calorie Sweeteners Committee .
The underlying SWEET, SWITCH, and Sweet Tooth studies were funded respectively by the EU's Horizon 2020 program, the American Beverage Association, and the Dutch government's TKI Top Sector Agri-Food public-private partnership scheme, together with private-sector contributions.
According to Graham Finlayson at the University of Leeds, "A common concern is that replacing sugar with non-nutritive sweeteners might lead to a stronger preference for sugary sweet foods or stimulate appetite. Across these controlled studies, that prediction was not supported. Sweeteners are not a weight-management strategy by themselves, but they can provide a useful way to reduce sugar while retaining sweetness within a broader healthy diet."
Why It Matters
Public health guidance on sugar substitutes has been inconsistent. Some bodies, including the World Health Organization, have cautioned against relying on non-nutritive sweeteners for weight control and have suggested reducing sweetness in the diet overall — regardless of its source.
Other professional groups, including several in the UK, view NNSs as a legitimate tool for cutting sugar intake. Much of the disagreement traces back to a divide between randomized controlled trials, which tend to show neutral or favorable effects, and observational studies, which more often report associations with health risks — associations that can be distorted by the fact that people already at higher metabolic risk tend to consume more sweeteners in the first place.
To help resolve some of this uncertainty, the authors focused specifically on evidence from three large European multi-year, multi-center randomized trials designed to isolate cause-and-effect relationships under real-world conditions.
What the Studies Found
Weight and body composition: Across all three consortia, replacing sugar with non-nutritive sweeteners did not undermine weight loss or maintenance — and in some cases appeared to help. In a one-year weight-loss-maintenance trial from the SWEET consortium, participants who included NNSs in their diet maintained modestly greater weight loss after a year than those who avoided them, with the largest differences seen among the most adherent participants. A separate 52-week SWITCH trial found that people drinking NNS-sweetened beverages lost slightly more weight than those drinking water, though the difference fell short of a threshold considered clinically meaningful. Meanwhile, the Sweet Tooth trial, which manipulated overall dietary sweetness exposure up or down without any weight-loss goal, found no meaningful impact on body weight or body composition either way.
Metabolic and cardiovascular markers: Blood sugar, insulin, blood pressure, cholesterol, liver enzymes, and related biomarkers were generally stable and comparable across sweetener and non-sweetener groups. In some acute and short-term tests, replacing sugar with sweeteners was linked to smaller post-meal blood sugar and insulin spikes. A modest shift in gut bacteria composition was observed in one sub-study, but it wasn't accompanied by any worsening of cardiometabolic risk markers.
Sweet taste preference and appetite: The review found no support for the idea that consuming sweeteners — or a sweeter diet generally — trains people to crave more sweetness or eat more overall. In fact, in the SWEET weight-maintenance trial, people who avoided sweeteners actually developed a stronger liking for sweet foods over time, while those who used sweeteners did not. Across the trials, measures of hunger, cravings, and actual food intake were largely similar regardless of sweetener use or sweetness exposure level.
Caveats
The authors note important limits to the evidence. The trials were conducted mainly in overweight adults, often within structured behavioral or clinical programs, so results may not generalize to other populations or everyday eating patterns. Some outcomes were secondary or exploratory, dropout rates were higher than ideal in places, and self-reported dietary intake is prone to underreporting. The authors emphasize that null findings reflect no detectable difference within the specific populations and timeframes studied — not proof that no effect exists under any circumstances. Long-term effects, and effects in children and adolescents, remain unclear.
Bottom Line
Taken together, the SWEET, SWITCH, and Sweet Tooth consortia offer some of the most rigorous experimental evidence to date on this topic. The findings suggest that swapping sugar for non-nutritive sweeteners can be a useful tool in weight management strategies without apparent harm to metabolic health, and that broader differences in how sweet a person's diet is do not appear to meaningfully affect body weight, biomarkers, or taste preferences over the periods studied.
Further Information
The article is freely available here.
The Institute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences (IAFNS)
The Institute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences (IAFNS) is committed to leading positive change across the food and beverage ecosystem. This paper was supported by IAFNS' Low- and No-Calorie Sweeteners Committee . IAFNS is a 501(c)(3) science-focused nonprofit uniquely positioned to mobilize government, industry and academia to drive, fund and lead actionable research. iafns.org
University of Leeds
The University of Leeds is one of the largest higher education institutions in the UK, with more than 37,000 students from about 140 different countries. We are renowned globally for the quality of our teaching and research.
We are a values-driven university, and we harness our expertise in research and education to help shape a better future for humanity, working through collaboration to tackle inequalities, achieve societal impact and drive change.
The University is a member of the Russell Group of research-intensive universities, and is a major partner in the Alan Turing, Rosalind Franklin and Royce Institutes www.leeds.ac.uk
