More than half of U.S. teens living in households with firearms believe they can access and load a firearm at home . Even when their parents report storing all firearms locked and unloaded, more than one-third of teens still believe they could access and load one. These are the main findings of our new study, published in the journal JAMA Network Open.
Authors
- Katherine G. Hastings
PhD Candidate in Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia
- Rebeccah Sokol
Assistant Professor of Social Work, University of Michigan
We are behavioral scientists investigating youth injury prevention and youth safety . In this study, we analyzed national survey data from nearly 500 parents who owned firearms and their teens. One survey asked the parents to report how many firearms they had in the home and how they stored each one. Another asked their teens to estimate how quickly they could access and load a firearm at home.
While the presence of unlocked and loaded firearms in the home was weakly linked to perceived access among teens, we found that parents' storage practices alone were a poor predictor of whether teens believed they could access a firearm. What's more, in households with more than one firearm, locking up more firearms was not at all linked to perceived access among teens if at least one remained unsecured.
In short, just one unlocked firearm can undo the protective benefit of securing all other firearms in the home, our results showed.
Why it matters
In the U.S., firearms are now the leading cause of death among children and teens. In most of these cases, the firearm used belonged to a parent, relative or friend .
Our study focused on teens' beliefs about firearm access, not their actual access. However, these perceptions may provide important clues around firearm access and use. Prior research shows that teens who believe they can access a firearm are more likely to access and carry one . This is particularly concerning for teens who already have a higher risk for dying by suicide .
One of the most widely supported ways to reduce teen injuries and deaths by firearms is to encourage owners to keep firearms locked and unloaded . However, most firearm-owning households in the U.S. have multiple firearms , and owners often store some firearms securely but not all .
Despite evidence that securely storing firearms saves lives , efforts to promote that messaging may be less effective when it is not universally applied to all firearms in the home or when teens still know how to access them.
Our study also points to the need for messaging and safety strategies that consider teen behavior amid household firearm dynamics. For example, teens may observe where firearms are stored or know where keys or combinations are kept and unlock firearms in moments of impulsivity or emotional distress. Beyond securely storing firearms, encouraging parents to treat every firearm in the household as a potential source of risk and talking with teens about how to address conflicts and promote mental and emotional well-being may also be protective.
Additionally, our study adds support for universal laws that require securely storing all firearms in homes in which children live and mandating routine assessments of teen firearm access by pediatricians.
What still isn't known
It is still unclear how teens' beliefs about their access to firearms affects whether they actually seek them out - or how the variability of parents' practices on storing firearms affects teen access.
Another important question is how teens' perceptions of their access to firearms at home may vary depending on cultural backgrounds, geography and different households' attitudes and beliefs around firearm use.
Additionally, our study looked only at teens ages 14 to 18. Further research is needed to explore these associations among younger children in firearm-owning households.
The Research Brief is a short take on interesting academic work.
Rebeccah Sokol receives funding from the National Institutes of Health and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Katherine G. Hastings does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
