Toxic treatment: Britney Spears is being heard - unlike those before her

Monash Lens

Over the past week, media attention worldwide has been focused on singer Britney Spears' attempts to free herself from the conservatorship that limits her financial, professional and personal autonomy.

  • Fiona Gregory

    Lecturer, Literary Studies, Faculty of Arts

The idea that an internationally successful pop superstar "isn't even allowed to choose the colour of her kitchen cabinets", let alone maintain control over her medical and reproductive decisions, has proven deeply unsettling.

There's been justifiable outrage over the past week at Spears' treatment, and yet the singer has lived with the conservatorship since 2008, and the #FreeBritney campaign has been striving to draw attention to her plight for more than a decade. A recent New York Times documentary, Framing Britney Spears, brought a new audience to the case.

However, the factor that has really turned the tide in Spears' favour is that we've been able to hear her own voice on the matter.

Performers forcibly committed

Over the past century, many successful female performers have been forcibly committed to psychiatric treatment, frequently by members of their family, and compelled to remain in care for years, if not decades.

Some, such as Lily Elsie

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.