How has pandemic impacted our wellbeing?

New research from Professor Roger Gill, helps us to understand the impact of ongoing Covid-19 restrictions on mental health and wellbeing. The study, delivered in partnership with Professor Matt Grawitch and colleagues at St Louis University in Missouri, surveyed people living and working across the UK, France, Germany, Canada and the US.

Factors

The team carried out surveys with participants throughout June 2020. They explored how various demographic factors, individual differences and leadership experiences had influenced people's perceptions of the pandemic on their lives, as well as its actual impact.

Individual differences in adaptivity and resilience were found to positively contribute to participants' work engagement, as well as effective leadership.

Essential workers

The study also found some unexpected results. While demographic factors such as being an essential worker or being responsible for children influenced how lockdown restrictions impacted the respondents' lives, there was no evidence to suggest these had any negative impact on health or wellbeing. In fact, all three factors led to better wellbeing outcomes.

"It's true that many workers encountered new demands on their time, such as needing to learn new tech like Zoom or navigating makeshift work procedures, and new financial demands as well as facing the loss of essential financial resources. However, the shift created a series of trade-offs for most people. There were different constraints on the way people allocated their time, energy and money that did not necessarily lead to negative consequences." Professor Gill

A better work-life balance for some

An example is those who previously faced lengthy commutes have benefited from a better work-life balance and reduced expenses. Those with insecure work hours or placed on furlough were able to qualify for financial support to ease the burden.

Resilience

The key difference in participants' lockdown experience was found in their individual levels of resilience. Those better prepared for remote living and working via flexible work arrangements prior to lockdown fared better than others, regardless of personal circumstances.

Lessons for the future

The researchers say the study provides vital lessons for individuals, employers and indeed governments in protecting people's mental health and wellbeing, in the event of future pandemics and lockdown scenarios.

Some considerations are:

  • Increase personal resources

It's important for individuals to recognise that increasing their personal resources (time, energy and money) may help them to mitigate the pandemic's negative impact on their wellbeing.

  • Individual differences and resources

Business leaders would benefit from understanding how employees' individual differences and resources may impact their work-related wellbeing, particularly when new rules and procedures such as socially-distanced office set-ups, long-term remote working and extended furlough are implemented.

  • Working conditions

Leaders must also create working conditions that preserve the mental health and wellbeing of their employees. Helping employees to recognise signs of stress and their causes, maintaining an open-door policy for discussing problems, and providing training in managing workloads are all simple but vital steps.

  • Track society's mental health

    It's vital for governments to ensure that policymakers track society's mental, physical and work-related health status when considering and implementing lockdown measures in future.

"Given the dynamic nature of lockdowns and restrictions, it's important to track how people in various parts of the world are responding to the crisis and its effects on individual health. Our findings have important implications for individuals, organisations and society as a whole." Professor Gill

/Durham University Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.