March 2024 Performance Update from Planning Inspectorate

On a monthly basis, we publish the latest official statistics on appeals performance, which represent the greatest volume (in terms of number of cases) of the work of the Planning Inspectorate.

We also update the appeals handling times data to give customers the latest information on the average time it takes to receive a decision and provide an update on our other main casework areas.

Appeals

Our appeal cases are dealt with in one of three ways: written representations, hearings, or inquiries. Ministerial performance measures include an expectation to reduce average decision times over time and make our decision speeds more consistent. All our decision times are measured from the day we receive a valid appeal through to the day we issue a decision. This is the same approach as Local Planning Authorities.

We have made 18,372 appeal decisions in the last 12 months, an average of 1,531 per month. The number of decisions in February 2024 was 1,654.

February also continued a trend of closing more cases (1,859) than we received (1,571), bringing the number of cases open by the end of the month to 13,211.

We're committed to removing our casework backlog so that all our casework is decided in consistent timeframes, whilst maintaining high standards in our decisions. To help us achieve that, we've been deciding many older planning appeals decided by written representations. Throughout 2024 we will continue to do this so that our decisions become faster and are made in a more consistent timeframe.

After a successful trial, new appeals against enforcement notices being heard by inquiry are now following a timetable very similar to planning appeals by hearing and inquiry. This means the inquiry being held 14-18 weeks after appeal submission, and decisions starting to be issued within 26-30 weeks. We will gradually clear older enforcement notice appeals by inquiry during this year.

Median decision times

The median decision time for cases decided in February was 28 weeks. The average over the past 12 months was 31 weeks.

12 months to February 2024 median decision timeFebruary 2024 median decision time
Planning appeals by written representations29 weeks27 weeks
Planning appeals by hearing28 weeks30 weeks
Planning appeals by inquiry31 weeks34 weeks
Enforcement appeals by written representations52 weeks49 weeks
Enforcement appeals by hearing66 weeks61 weeks
Enforcement appeals by inquiry88 weeks43 weeks
All appeals31 weeks28 weeks

National Infrastructure

The number of applications has started to rise but we continue to meet all statutory deadlines.

We have a high number of Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIPs) at various stages:

  • 72 where we are providing advice before submission.
  • 13 submitted and at acceptance, pre-examination, or examination.
  • 7 where we are preparing our recommendation.
  • 8 where the relevant Secretary of State is considering our recommendation.

The continuous work to examine NSIPs is key to the economic growth of the country.

In the last month, several NSIPs have been granted development consent by the relevant Secretary of State. They include:

We're working to help deliver the Government's aim to improve and speed up the consenting process for the country's major infrastructure projects. Have a read to see how we're supporting reforms by progressing exciting projects including establishing a new pre-application service for NSIPs (Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects); establishing a fast-track route to decision making; and modernising our National Infrastructure Planning website to make it easier to find information and engage in the NSIP process.

Local Plans

There are currently 42 live Local Plan examinations in progress.

We encourage Local Planning Authorities (LPA) to use our advisory visits to help them get their plans in good shape and deal with challenges well before submission.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.