NASA Grants $5M to Women's Colleges for STEM Gender Gap

An audience member asks a question at the Engaging Women and Girls in STEM through Data Science event on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, at NASA Headquarters in Washington. The event was held as part of the White House's United State of Women Summit.
Credits: NASA/Aubrey Gemignani

As part of a Biden/Harris initiative, NASA will award more than$5 million in funding to seven Womens Colleges and Universities (WCUs) to research and develop strategies that increase retention of women in STEM degree programs and careers.

The agencys Minority University Research and Education Project (MUREP) created the Womens Colleges and Universities opportunity to help women overcome obstacles and barriers to working in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and math.

This award seeks to address the significant national gender gap and disparate experiences of women in STEM in the United States, both in higher education and the workforce.

This is a very exciting first; were making strides to close the pervasive gender gap in STEM, and Womens Colleges and Universities are well-positioned to help drive that positive change, said NASA Deputy Administrator Pam Melroy, a graduate from Wellesley College. Its more important than ever we have brilliant, enthusiastic people entering the workforce and ready to take on the ambitious plans and challenges ahead.

Created in response to the White House Executive Order 14035 Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in the Federal Workforce, this funding opportunity asked Womens Colleges and Universities to take advantage of their expertise by developing programs that encompass academics, research, student support, college prep, career prep, mentoring, and more. NASA explores the unknown for all, and values diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility for the future STEM and agency workforce.

The gender gap is reflected in education and workforce data. Women earn 59% of undergraduate degrees compared to 41% of men, but only 10% of womens degrees are in a STEM field as stated by the National Center of Education Statistics. This pattern follows women into the workplace, where they represent about 47% of the workforce, but only 27% of STEM jobs as stated by the U.S. Census Bureau. Among women of color in STEM, fewer than one in 20 are scientists and engineers. At NASA, 26% of the agencys scientists and engineers are women.

These programs were developed to factor in gender, race, sexual orientation, socio-economic status, and other identities that can play a role in students career trajectories. Each awardee also will provide a guidebook of data, instructions, and best practices to serve as a blueprint for other Minority-Serving Institutions and Womens Colleges seeking to create similar programs.

The selected institutions and their proposed projects are:

  • Agnes Scott College, Decatur, Georgia

Alumnae Network & Career Resources Program STEM Support Anchored at Agnes Scott College

  • Alverno College, Milwaukee

Alverno College "Launching the Future: An Intersectional Approach to Boosting Recruitment and Retention of Women in STEM Undergraduate Education

  • Cedar Crest College, Allentown, Pennsylvania

TOWERS Tackling Obstacles for Womens Engagement & Retention in STEM at Cedar Crest College

  • College of Saint Mary, Omaha, Nebraska

Project BLOOM for Women in STEM Bolstering Learning, Opportunities, Outreach, and Mindfulness

  • Salem Academy and College, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Soar With Salem: A Comprehensive Program to Inspire Women and Girls to Become the Next Generation of STEM Professionals

  • Simmons University, Boston

DREAM-WSTEM (Dynamic Research Education Academy for Mentoring Women in STEM)

  • Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts

Developing a Pathway to MaRS (Math Resilient Students) in STEM: A Cascading Mentorship Model

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.