New Checklist Aims to Improve Reporting in Biomedical Research

PLOS

Author Interview:

  1. Why did you create this reporting guideline?

We created this reporting guideline because consensus methods are widely used to produce recommendations in research and patient care, and so it is important to be able to judge how well they were conducted and how relevant these results might be.

  1. How did you go about this?

We assembled an international steering committee of clinicians, journal editors, guideline and consensus experts, publication professionals and patients to look at how consensus methods are currently reported and then develop best practice in consensus reporting.

  1. What most surprised or interested you when you were creating this checklist?

We were surprised at how much published literature there is on poor reporting of consensus methods, but a comprehensive reporting guideline had not been developed.

  1. What impact do you hope the ACCORD checklist might have?

We hope that the ACCORD checklist will help researchers to report consensus processes more fully, and help readers assess their results critically and apply them appropriately.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.