Despite decades of ocean exploration, humans still lack basic answers to one of the most fundamental ecological questions: where is marine life found, and why?
A new study led by
Dr Amelia Bridges and
Professor Kerry Howell, published in Communications Earth & Environment, highlights just how uneven our knowledge of ocean biodiversity really is.
By systematically processing nearly 19 million records from the Ocean Biodiversity Information System (OBIS), the study reveals that global marine biodiversity data from below 30m are heavily biased towards shallow waters (50% of benthic records come from just the shallowest 1% of the seafloor), the Northern Hemisphere (over 75% of records), and vertebrates, namely fish.
What's missing from that are vast areas of the deep sea, particularly in the southern hemisphere and Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ), which remain under-sampled. Invertebrates, despite making up the bulk of ocean biodiversity, are also poorly represented.
These findings matter. Biodiversity data underpin everything from habitat protection to climate impact modelling. The current data gaps mean that scientific models and management plans risk being skewed, trained on better-known regions and taxa while overlooking some of the most threatened and least studied parts of the planet.
To elucidate these patterns, the researchers developed a novel pipeline that separates benthic (seafloor) and pelagic (open-water) data - an important but often overlooked distinction. While the technical achievement is notable, the real story here is what the cleaned data reveal: a global call to action.
The authors urge future sampling to focus on four key priorities: the deep ocean (>1500 m); the southern hemisphere; invertebrate taxa; remote areas beyond national jurisdiction.
This work is a major step forward in turning biodiversity 'big data' into meaningful insight, with the datasets and code serving as a resource for researchers, policymakers, and conservationists working to meet the goals of the UN Decade of Ocean Science and the 30x30 biodiversity target.
/University Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.
