Queensland drivers support tougher and clearer distracted driving laws as technology becomes more complex, according to new research from QUT.
The study, which surveyed 494 licensed drivers across the state and was published in Transport Policy, found strong public support for "technology neutral" legislation that would extend beyond mobile phones to cover smartwatches, in-built touchscreens, mounted devices and other emerging technologies.
Lead author Dr Sina Rejali, a Research Fellow from the QUT School of Psychology and Counselling and the MAIC-QUT Road Safety Research Collaboration, said drivers recognised that current laws had not kept pace with the realities of modern tech.
"Drivers told us they want rules that reflect the technology they actually use every day," Dr Rejali said.
"Many felt the existing legislation is too narrow and doesn't address the full range of distractions now present in cars."
Participants overwhelmingly viewed the proposed rules as more effective and more comprehensive than current legislation, particularly in reducing grey areas around what drivers can and cannot do.
"People want clarity and consistency," Dr Rejali said.
"They want to know exactly what's allowed, and the proposed rules are designed to clearly explain how drivers can safely and legally interact with different types of devices on the road."
Group comparisons revealed important differences in how drivers perceived the proposed rules.
Young drivers and males reported lower levels of perceived freedom, meaning they felt the rules would restrict their autonomy more than other groups.
However, this did not necessarily translate to lower overall support.
While most participants viewed the proposed rules as clearer than current laws, some raised concerns about enforcement and the need for public education to ensure drivers understand the changes.
"Stronger rules are only part of the solution," Dr Rejali said.
"Drivers emphasised that education and consistent enforcement will be essential if these laws are to make a real difference.
"But our findings show the public is ready for laws that better protect them in a world where digital devices are everywhere."
The QUT research team also included Dr Sherrie-Anne Kaye from the MAIC-QUT Road Safety Research Collaboration.
Read the full study, Factors influencing public support for more comprehensive road safety policies: The case of technology-neutral distracted driving rules, published in Transport Policy, online.
Main image (left to right): Dr Sherrie-Anne Kaye and Dr Sina Rejali
