A medical blueprint for when next coronavirus strikes

Monash Lens

Professor Carl Kirkpatrick has helped edit a new collection of research papers largely focused on COVID-19 and what happens next. The start-point for society, and healthcare, he says, is that something similar will reoccur. He can even estimate when.

  • Carl Kirkpatrick

    Professor, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety

"In eight to 10 years, there will very likely be another novel [new] virus," says the Monash University pharmaceutical scientist. "We've had SARS-COV1 [SARS, 2003], H1N1 [Swine Flu, 2009], MERS-COV [Camel Flu, 2012], and now COVID-19. This current virus will change again, or it may be a different coronavirus, or another novel respiratory virus."

At the onset of the COVID pandemic, he says, there was no industry, regulatory or government guidance "to help researchers, drug developers, clinicians and policymakers determine the best pathways to either repurpose existing medicines or swiftly develop new medicines to treat people with COVID infections".

The way forward

The research papers published in the prestigious British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology are, he says, a blueprint for the way forward in the development and repurposing of medicines for respiratory virus patients in the post-COVID era. Currently, there are vaccines but no useful therapies. In the future, these new or existing drugs (or a combination of both) look likely to be used for patients or when vaccines don't work.

"They are the guidelines for the next coronavirus, next respiratory virus, or the next pandemic that comes out," he says. "These are the guidance documents we desperately needed in early 2020 - a 'cookbook', if you will, of what we need to do, and in hindsight, what we could have done better."

Tracking the life cycle of a virus

Professor Kirkpatrick leads the pharmacometrics research program at Monash's Centre for Medicine Use and Safety. He's co-edited the journal's special edition and contributed papers, as a co-author, examining COVID-19's highly problematic life cycle. The study was funded by the Gates Foundation and completed in partnership with Certara, a global drug development company.

A medicine vial sits between a row of wooden blocks, stopping a domino effect.

Professor Kirkpatrick's specific area of expertise is viral kinetic modelling, where infections, the journey of a virus in the body, the inflammation caused, and the ability of the drug to stop or reduce viral replication by medicines are mathematically mapped.

His pharmacological and mathematical examination of COVID-19 and potential future pandemics began almost 10 years ago with the influenza drug oseltamivir, or Tamiflu. The modelling work undertaken was then used as a blueprint to map a fictional pandemic.

"The questions we were answering then were, what would we need to do to shut a pandemic down, and how many people would we need to treat, and at what dose of oseltamivir," he says.

Then, still pre-COVID, he was involved in another project on early-phase development of lumictabine for the acute children's virus RSV, or respiratory syncytial syndrome, which enabled greater insights into the time course of viral replication, and how to optimise drug therapy.

"Treatment needs to be something that can knock the viral load down as quickly as possible, along with other medications that can then mop up that inflammatory soup in the respiratory and other tissues."

In January last year, COVID-19 hit - and much of this previous work on respiratory viral loads in people, and the life and death of respiratory viruses, was about to come in extremely handy.

Professor Kirkpatrick's collaborator, Dr Craig Rayner (president of Integrated Drug Development at Certara in the United States), was immediately seconded to a World Health Organisation taskforce. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded the COVID-19 Pharmacology Resource Centre

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.