An inspection of Home Office intelligence collection capabilities

Type writer

Launching the 'call for evidence', David Bolt said:

In my report 'An Inspection of the Intelligence Functions of Border Force and Immigration Enforcement' published in July 2016, I examined the extent to which the Home Office's Borders, Immigration and Citizenship System (BICS) was truly "intelligence-led". This current inspection will examine intelligence collection capabilities across BICS, in particular the efficiency and effectiveness of the network of Field Intelligence Officers and other staff responsible for the collection of information (in the UK and overseas) about immigration or customs threats and abuses that is developed into actionable intelligence.

I am interested in what is working well and in what improvements need to be made. To that end, I am inviting organisations and individuals who have experience of liaising with Field Intelligence Officers to write to me with their evidence, including any examples or case studies they are able to share.

This is an area of BICS work that will not be visible to everyone, and elements of it require absolute discretion, but I would also like to hear from anyone who has looked to share information about suspicious immigration or customs activities with the Home Office (BICS), in person, by telephone or by email, regarding how easy or otherwise they found the process and what further contact or feedback they received concerning the information they provided.

Please note that my remit does not extend to investigating or making decisions about individual cases. This remains a Home Office responsibility. If you think an immigration or customs crime has been committed, you should notify the Home Office at: Report an immigration or border crime

Please email the Chief Inspector:

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.