IMF Approves €2.4B Stand-by Arrangement for Serbia

  • The IMF approved yesterday a two-year Stand-by Arrangement (SBA) for the Republic of Serbia amounting to about SDR 1.89 billion, or approximately 2.4 billion EUR. The SBA will replace the existing Policy Coordination Instrument (PCI) and build on the PCI reform agenda with appropriate modifications for recent policy challenges.
  • In the context of the energy crisis, the SBA focuses on addressing external and fiscal financing needs, maintaining macroeconomic and financial stability, and continuing to strengthen the economy's performance and resilience through structural reforms, especially in the energy sector.
  • The authorities intend to make the first three purchases that become available under the SBA in 2022 and 2023 and treat the remainder as precautionary.
  • The IMF also concluded the 3rd Review of the existing PCI, which is cancelled upon approval of the SBA.

Washington, DC: The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) approved a EUR 2.4 billion (or the equivalent of 290 percent of quota and SDR 1.89892 billion) SBA yesterday for the Republic of Serbia. The SBA provides support for the authorities' economic policies over the next two years. The Board's decision makes approximately EUR 1 billion (120 percent of quota and SDR 785.76 million) available immediately, which the authorities intend to purchase. Future purchases become available upon completion of semi-annual reviews. The authorities intend to make further purchases in 2023, while treating the 2024 amounts as precautionary.

The Executive Board of the IMF also concluded the third review under the PCI[1]for the Republic of Serbia. The PCI was approved on June 18, 2021 and aimed at: supporting the recovery from the Covid pandemic, maintaining macroeconomic stability, and anchoring the medium-term fiscal policy framework, while pushing ahead with structural reforms to deliver more inclusive and sustainable growth. The SBA will replace the existing PCI and build on the PCI reform agenda with appropriate modifications for recent policy challenges.

The authorities' program supported by the SBA takes forward the policies already pursued under the PCI, while incorporating additional actions to address the energy crisis and

increase buffers amidst high uncertainty. Policies seek to address actual and potential external and fiscal financing needs, maintain macroeconomic and financial stability, and continue to strengthen the economy's performance and resilience through structural reforms, with a special focus on the energy sector.

At the conclusion of the Board discussion on the Republic of Serbia, Mrs. Gita Gopinath, First Deputy Managing Director, made the following statement:

"Serbia has built a strong track record of solid macroeconomic performance, supported by the IMF under the Policy Coordination Instrument (PCI). However, with high energy prices, a longer timeline to fully restore domestic electricity production, high inflation, and lower trading partner growth, the current account and the outlook for economic growth have weakened while additional fiscal financing needs have emerged. The authorities have preserved macro-financial stability and have already put policies in place to mitigate these shocks. Amid high uncertainty, they seek to build additional buffers supported by a Stand-by Arrangement.

Taking forward the policies under the PCI, the authorities are rightly containing the fiscal deficit while providing temporary support to the state-owned energy companies. Gradually raising Serbia's comparatively low domestic energy tariffs while protecting the most vulnerable will be important for restoring cost recovery over the medium term, eliminating the fiscal drain, and encouraging energy conservation. The new fiscal rules will provide an important anchor for medium-term fiscal discipline.

Reforms of the energy sector are a high priority. The planned reform strategy for power company EPS, a prioritized sectoral investment plan, and a new Energy Development Strategy will help guide these reforms in both the public and the private sectors.

Amid ongoing global and domestic inflationary pressures, monetary policy has rightly continued to be tightened. The National Bank of Serbia's vigilance in ensuring price stability will be key to curbing inflation expectations and bringing inflation back within the inflation band.

Additional structural reform commitments, including on fiscal management and governance of state-owned enterprises, aimed at underpinning medium-term growth are also important."

Annex

Recent Economic Developments

Serbia's economy rebounded quickly from the Covid pandemic, and the authorities embarked on a well-paced consolidation path to rebuild buffers, supported by a program under the PCI. However, risks foreshadowed at the Second Review of the PCI have materialized: higher energy prices and domestic electricity production problems have significantly increased balance of payments and fiscal financing needs. And high global inflation, a weak outlook for trading partner growth, and ongoing spillovers from Russia's war in Ukraine weigh on the outlook despite its still-strong macroeconomic policies.

Program Summary

The two-year SBA would help cover the external and fiscal financing needs through the coming winter stemming from elevated energy import costs and worsening global financing conditions, and maintain external buffers in an environment of high risks. Some policies include:

  • Energy tariff adjustments and structural reforms to restore the financial balances of the state-owned energy utilities EPS and Srbijagas within two years, while cushioning the impact on vulnerable households and supporting the energy utilities through fiscal transfers in the short term;
  • Tight monetary and fiscal policies to control inflation and provide support for the stabilized exchange rate;
  • Further fiscal transparency and budget reforms to support fiscal discipline and the effective implementation of the new fiscal rule; and
  • Ongoing reforms to strengthen SOE governance and oversight.


[1]The PCI is available to all IMF members that do not need Fund financial resources at the time of approval. It is designed for countries seeking to demonstrate commitment to a reform agenda or to unlock and coordinate financing from other official creditors or private investors

Table 1. Serbia: Selected Economic and Social Indicators, 2019–2024

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

CR 22/201

Proj.

CR 22/201

Proj.

CR 22/201

Proj.

(Percent change, unless otherwise indicated)

Real sector

Real GDP

4.3

-0.9

7.5

3.5

2.5

4.0

2.3

4.0

3.0

Consumer prices (average)

1.9

1.6

4.1

9.0

12.1

5.9

12.2

3.7

5.3

Consumer prices (end of period)

1.9

1.3

7.9

8.0

15.8

4.3

8.2

3.7

4.0

GDP deflator

2.4

2.4

5.9

6.8

10.3

7.0

10.7

5.2

6.7

Unemployment rate (in percent) 1/

11.2

9.7

11.0

10.5

11.1

10.6

Nominal GDP (in billions of dinars)

5,422

5,504

6,270

6,931

7,088

7,711

8,026

8,437

8,821

(Percent of GDP)

General government finances

Revenue 2/

42.0

41.0

43.3

41.3

43.0

41.6

41.6

41.7

41.6

Expenditure 2/

42.2

49.0

47.4

44.3

46.8

43.1

44.9

42.9

43.8

Current 2/

36.9

42.7

39.0

37.5

37.1

36.2

36.1

35.9

36.0

Capital and net lending

5.1

6.1

8.3

6.8

9.4

6.6

8.4

6.7

7.5

Amortization of called guarantees

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.3

Fiscal balance 3/

-0.2

-8.0

-4.1

-3.0

-3.8

-1.5

-3.3

-1.1

-2.2

Primary fiscal balance (cash basis)

1.8

-6.0

-2.4

-1.3

-2.2

0.8

-1.5

0.6

-0.4

Structural primary fiscal balance 4/

1.5

-4.1

-2.5

-1.0

-0.6

0.7

0.4

0.5

0.7

Gross debt /5

52.8

57.8

57.1

55.1

56.8

50.8

56.4

47.2

53.2

(End of period 12-month change, percent)

Monetary sector

Broad money (M2)

8.8

18.4

13.0

11.8

3.3

7.3

7.9

6.0

10.9

Domestic credit to non-government 6/

9.5

12.0

9.9

13.5

10.3

7.5

7.7

6.6

10.5

(Period average, percent)

Interest rates (dinar)

NBS key policy rate

2.3

1.0

1.0

Interest rate on new FX and FX-indexed loans

3.1

3.0

2.5

(Percent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated)

Balance of payments

Current account balance

-6.9

-4.1

-4.3

-6.1

-9.0

-5.7

-8.4

-6.0

-6.0

Trade of goods balance

-12.2

-11.1

-11.1

-12.7

-14.8

-11.9

-13.1

-11.2

-10.3

Exports of goods

35.7

34.3

39.0

38.7

42.8

36.7

43.2

36.0

42.5

Imports of goods

-47.9

-45.5

-50.1

-51.4

-57.6

-48.6

-56.3

-47.2

-52.8

Capital and financial account balance

10.6

5.0

8.9

3.2

7.0

7.2

7.3

6.9

6.7

External debt (percent of GDP)

65.7

70.3

71.3

66.2

68.0

62.3

65.4

58.0

61.5

of which: Private external debt

31.3

33.8

32.6

29.0

29.4

26.4

26.8

24.4

25.1

Gross official reserves

(in billions of euro)

13.4

13.5

16.5

14.7

16.3

15.7

16.6

16.4

17.6

(in months of prospective imports)

6.1

4.9

4.6

4.4

4.1

4.4

4.1

4.3

4.1

(percent of risk-weighted metric) 7/

125.0

121.9

131.5

114.3

118.9

113.9

111.8

112.8

110.4

Exchange rate (dinar/euro, period average)

117.9

117.6

117.6

REER (annual average change, in percent, + indicates appreciation)

1.0

1.5

1.4

Social indicators

Per capita GDP (in US$)

7,397

7,703

9,180

9,597

9,309

10,883

10,203

12,145

11,222

Population (in million)

7.0

6.9

6.9

6.8

6.8

6.8

6.8

6.8

6.8

Sources: Serbian authorities; and IMF staff estimates and projections.

1/ Unemployment rate of the 15+ labor force.

2/ Includes employer contributions.

3/ Includes amortization of called guarantees.

4/ Primary fiscal balance adjusted for the automatic effects of the output gap both on revenue and spending as well as one-offs. The calculation of the structural balance has been revised to include temporary one-off measures to respond to the pandemic and to the energy crisis.

5/ Excludes state guarantees on bank loans under the credit guarantee scheme introduced in response to the COVID-19 crisis.

6/ At constant exchange rates.

7/ The risk-weighted metric is IMF's ARA metric under fixed exchange rate. Serbia was reclassified as stabilized exchange rate regime in 2019.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.