Passive Video Reveals Bird-Window Collisions in Backyard

PeerJ

Collisions with glass windows on buildings, transportation shelters, noise barriers and fences are a major source of bird mortality. Public awareness of bird-window collisions has grown in recent years, thanks to surveys for dead birds beneath windows. However, as collisions events are difficult to observe directly, there are still major gaps in understanding how and why birds fly into windows, and what happens to the birds afterwards.

New research published in the Open Access, peer-reviewed journal PeerJ provides the first glimpse of what happens in the moments leading up to a bird colliding or avoiding impact with a window, by analyzing audio and motion-triggered video recordings at a residential setting with bird feeders. The article offers novel insight on a very important conservation topic and provides empirical data that are currently lacking but necessary for informing estimates of population-level impacts of bird mortality as well as designing effective collision prevention technologies.

Researchers from Western University and Purdue University compared the characteristics of birds' flights leading up to a collision to flights leading to a near miss. They recorded and analyzed 29 collisions and nine near-misses. Birds' flight velocity and angle of approach both predicted the outcomes following collisions, with faster flights at angles of approach closer to perpendicular being more dangerous for birds. These data reveal previously undocumented variation in birds' pre-collision behaviour.

Of the 29 collisions that were recorded during the study, only a small proportion resulted in an immediate fatality and were detected by building occupants. Most collisions were followed by the bird flying away without leaving a trace. It is believed that some of these birds may suffer injuries and later die far from the window site. This finding has implications for estimating population-level impacts of bird-window collisions and suggests that the extent of collisions may be vastly underestimated by traditional survey methods.

"Bird-window collisions happen all over the world throughout the year, but the frequency and severity of collisions seem to be underestimated by the public, especially at residential settings," writes Brendon Samuels, the first author. "One reason is that collisions happen suddenly and are difficult for people to observe directly. When birds fly away afterwards, it's unclear what ultimately happens to them. Our findings highlight how common collisions can be in residential settings, especially where there are bird attractants like feeders."

Research on bird-window collisions has focused mostly on quantifying the incidence of fatal window collisions at larger structures, yet residential buildings are the most numerous types of structure with windows, and thus represent the greatest cumulative threat to birds. New housing development is being prioritized in many parts of the world as appetite for large glass windows and glass railings continues to grow. Meanwhile, backyard bird feeding has gained in popularity over the pandemic, drawing more birds into high-risk settings.

New buildings can be designed based on practices that limit risk of bird-window collisions. Similarly, existing building windows, such as those on homes, can be retrofitted using simple materials to add visual markers to the exterior of the glass. An important direction for future research is to characterize how birds orient their eyes to detect and avoid collisions with windows, so that collision deterrents can be designed optimally to match bird vision. This study documented birds approaching windows from variable angles. The authors recommend that designs and tests of collision prevention technologies should take this into account.

The authors developed recommendations for actions aimed at reducing bird mortality caused by window collisions, and overcoming current knowledge gaps by providing scientists, practitioners, and policymakers with priorities to help inform future research and monitoring studies.

Recommendations

Estimates of bird-window collision mortality that are based on data collected through building surveys and other observational monitoring depending on carcass detection should consider that those methods will miss most collision events that occur but may not leave a trace behind. The total number of collisions that occur at a given building, or on a continent-wide scale, may be vastly underestimated.

Additional studies that can characterize how flight characteristics affect the force experienced by a bird during a collision will provide better estimates of the negative effects on birds that are able to fly away following a collision.

Although this study did not examine the effectiveness of bird collision deterrents, the risk of collisions at existing and new structures can be reduced through the application of "bird-friendly" materials such as fritted glass, window film or other visual markers.

This study found evidence that bird collisions occurred nearly as frequently with smaller transom windows as with large glass doors below. This contradicts findings of previous research that collisions are positively correlated with window area. Further research is needed to examine how façade-level characteristics of residential buildings, such as window area, influence collision risk. Windows of all sizes should be targeted for mitigating collision risk using deterrent technologies and evidence-based building design practices as outlined by bird friendly standards and guidelines.

Given that birds' flight velocity prior to impact predicts the lethality of collisions with windows, we recommend that bird attractants (feeders or baths) should be placed close to windows (within 1.5 feet or 0.5 m) to reduce the available space where birds can gain speed.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.